said by Sircolby45:said by pfak:PING 209.85.171.100 (209.85.171.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.667 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=13.803 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=13.018 ms
64 bytes from 209.85.171.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=14.344 ms
--- 209.85.171.100 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 13.018/13.708/14.344/0.472 ms
I win.. :--
Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community.
Depends on where you're pinging. =p
Pinging testmy.net [74.54.226.166] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=52
Reply from 74.54.226.166: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 74.54.226.166:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
I miss my 9ms ping to yahoo.com when I was on SBC's original dsl service years ago.... uverse has some added ping time.