said by doublea:said by Sircolby45:said by acid343211:Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=244
Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms
I win
. The connection above is not my connection. It is my parents internet connection. I have the good stuff.
Pinging 209.85.171.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=240
Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms
Those are not satellite connections are they? 88ms on a satellite?
Sure we can all post our pings :P
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\user>ping youtube.com
Pinging youtube.com [208.117.236.69] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Reply from 208.117.236.69: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=244
Ping statistics for 208.117.236.69:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 24ms
No 88ms is not physically possible on satellite. 480ms how long it takes light to travel without factoring in various delays. I am pinging from a fiber connection.
·