<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Hughesnet&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hughesnet-22300193</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:23:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:23:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Hughesnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hughesnet-22329413</link>
<description><![CDATA[lrymal posted : I've been blessed.  It has been great for me, other than latency.  I am very rural, though.<br><br><A HREF="http://speedtest.dslreports.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.dslreports.com/im/71074096/3547.png" border=0></a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hughesnet-22329413</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:19:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hughesnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hughesnet-22303379</link>
<description><![CDATA[ctceo posted : I agree, I'd get 56k (shotgun) before I'd get Hughes net. 56k x 2 worked quite well for anything but large downloads. ISDN is still overpriced alongside T1.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hughesnet-22303379</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:01:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hughesnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hughesnet-22300193</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : HughesNet is horrible. The connection always times out even when it is bright and sunny with not a cloud in the sky, and it is way overpriced. It's a miracle that I can even get on to write this. Bottom line, don't buy HughesNet unless you want to get cheated.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hughesnet-22300193</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:02:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

