<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>What&#x27;s wrong with it? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22334451</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:03:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:03:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s wrong with it?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22335914</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377417"><b>ctceo</b></A> : Last I checked it was just good business practice to use the appropriate wire in the first place rather than cobble something together. I know I wouldn't do something like that unless it was only intended to be used temporarily, VERY temporarily, if at all.<br><small>--<br>Would you like your ISP to govern how much you can use the web in a month? Well it might happen if we don't do something NOW!  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/PMDBI/" >www.ipetitions.com/petition/PMDBI/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22335914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:29:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What&#x27;s wrong with it?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1007470"><b>Clever_Proxy</b></A> : That connection shown in your picture is the analog phone connection which does not need the twists in Cat5e for data loss prevention. Getting a RJ-11 connector to fit over the jacket of a cat 5 cable is nearly impossible. How does that make the connection inappropriately installed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22334451</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:35:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
