site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER

1 edit

reply to espaeth

Re: Lay FTTH

quote:
Unicast IP-based streaming video (ala ATT's U-Verse solution) has infrastructure that needs to grow with each and every viewer, and comes with significantly limitations.
U-verse TV is not unicast IP. It's multicast IP via IGMPv3. So if every subscriber on the node is watching CBS, CBS only needs to be fed to the node once.

U-verse is currently limited to 2HD and mediocre quality HD video, but we can thank weakly deployed FTTN for that. If they had deployed nodes a little closer for 40mbps per home, they could go up to 4HD easily. Aside from the FTTN induced bandwidth crunch, the IPTV part of the system works brilliantly. One DVR easily records 4 channels at once. Channel changes are lightning fast. And adding HD channels is a non-issue for them.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.

Thursday, 31-May 10:02:01 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics