<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22338441</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:59:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:59:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22349837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  james <A HREF="/useremail/u/326902"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by JasonOD  :</small><br><br>it would be bad business if they didn't try to obtain maximum revenue.</div>That's exactly the short-sighted attitude that has caused long respected companies to lose loyal customers who have bought their products for decades.<br><br>Yeah, it makes sense for the CEO and shareholders who will bail out in 2 years, but the company is completely screwed after those 2 years when the once loyal customers decide to shop elsewhere.<br><br>Would you rather rip me off for $50 right now and never see me again, or would you rather I give you $10 a week for the rest of my life?<br> </div>How can you call such customers "loyal" if they leave over anything above rock-bottom prices?  Or do you really mean "lazy" or "illogical" customers who knowingly pay more than they have to under some bizarre belief that the company will treat long-time customers better than brand-new customers?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22349837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:01:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22339596</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/326902"><b>james</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by JasonOD :</small><br><br>it would be bad business if they didn't try to obtain maximum revenue.</div>That's exactly the short-sighted attitude that has caused long respected companies to lose loyal customers who have bought their products for decades.<br><br>Yeah, it makes sense for the CEO and shareholders who will bail out in 2 years, but the company is completely screwed after those 2 years when the once loyal customers decide to shop elsewhere.<br><br>Would you rather rip me off for $50 right now and never see me again, or would you rather I give you $10 a week for the rest of my life?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22339596</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:52:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22338441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027040"><b>myokitis</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  benc <A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Absolutely disgusting! </div>Wait a minute . . . where is it written that the price for a service must be proportional to it's cost?  <br><br>In business-terminology it's called "value based pricing".  It's where a business wants to be . . . would you rather be in the cellular business right now, or a commodity business, like the airlines where margins are so low and costs so high, they're forced to be closer to cost-based pricing?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22338441</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:49:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22338114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/765295"><b>canesfan2001</b></A> : You don't have to text, but for those of us who know we're getting ripped off, educating others can help lower our costs.<br><small>--<br>OASAASLLS</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22338114</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : You don't have to text BTW.  This is a value add and it would be bad business if they didn't try to obtain maximum revenue.  It also provides some cash-flow stability.  If there is a competitive or market driven reason for them to not charge so much, they won't.  And it's not like other industries don't do this.  Ink is a major cash cow for the printer industry.  Overages may be the next cash cow for the Telco's and Cableco's as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337756</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:42:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337718</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : My old ATT plan was great<br><br>5 cents for outgoing text messages<br>Free incomming<br>No additional monthly charge!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337718</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:35:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Text Messages Cost $1,342,177.28 per GB</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337605</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : 1GB = 1,073,741,824 bytes<br><br>1,073,741,824 bytes / 160 bytes per SMS = 6,710,886.4 SMS<br><br>6,710,886.4 SMS * $.20 per SMS = $1,342,177.28 per GB<br><br>Absolutely disgusting!<br><br>OK, so no one will ever send over 6 million SMS messages in a single month.  Yet an unlimited SMS option costs $20 / mo.  So that's $20 for less than 1GB of data transfer.<br><br>They could charge $.01 per SMS, or $1/mo. for unlimited SMS and still have a huge markup.<br><br>With the advent of mobile Internet, and the ability to use mobile E-mail, there is no more reason to use SMS messages.  For contacts without mobile E-mail, you can use an E-mail to SMS gateway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22337605</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:08:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
