Reviews:
 ·ViaTalk
1 edit | reply to dmolavi
Re: Two year customer coming up on renewal... Just for grins, place the AC_211 in front of your router. Last month, found that my router was introducing WAF damaging latency, so placing in-front of the router has resolved all my issues. More recently I acquired a (NAized) SPA-2102NA which experienced the same router induced latency. I now have it in front of the router and have zero issues & WAF instantly restored. I placed my router WANIP into the ATA DMZ which makes the ATA invisible to my router allowing unfiltered internet traffic. I have great VoIP quality, no double NAT to impede p2p, all is good. I'm told that Firmware 5.2.5 required to allow SPA to manage memory properly in router mode using DMZ, all I know is it works.
btw:My AC-211 still works fine, just wanted more line#2 options offered by the SPA-2102NA. Time to sell my Innomedia as I don't need 3 ATAs.
edit: no, we paid no activation fee to VT during the weeks following SR collapse. |
|
 dmolaviPremium
join:2005-04-11
Sewell, NJ | I have FiOS, with coax coming into the Actiontec, so it can't go in front of that. I do have the AC-211 on it's own LAN segment behind the Actiontec.
--
NukedGallery.net
TheMolavis.com |
|
Reviews:
·ViaTalk
| Just saying a PAP2 may not resolve your issue. Switching providers also may not resolve your issues.
Call VT and have them look at your latency reading to the AC-211 -they measure it every 10 seconds. My AC-211 had better latency readings than the SPA when behind the router. THe AC-211 had 450ms and the SPA had up to 1500ms latency. |
|
