<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: overhead is significant&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-overhead-is-significant-22352883</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: overhead is significant</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-overhead-is-significant-22353623</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : You would need 3mbps upload for the overhead of a 100mbps download.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-overhead-is-significant-22353623</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:05:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: overhead is significant</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-overhead-is-significant-22352957</link>
<description><![CDATA[jadebangle posted : still a palty 896kbps upload<br>all the way good to 100mbps LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-overhead-is-significant-22352957</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:53:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>overhead is significant</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/overhead-is-significant-22352883</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Keep in mind the overhead for Qwests ADSL2+ is also significant.  I can say from personal experience that the 20mbit in reality is closer to 16-17 actual throughput for virtually all users.  Contrasted with Comcast where the 16mbit tier is actually provisioned at 17.6mbit and more often than not that's what you got.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/overhead-is-significant-22352883</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:38:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

