| reply to burgerwars
Re: Should have done FTTH from the start. I don't understand this fanboy-ism of ftth vs fttn. all that matter is speed and much you pay for it, ignoring stuff like caps, throttling, and other wonderful 'features' ISPs are throwing in for free. it is just like the intel vs. amd processor/system architecture. people are so concerned on the architecture that the lose sight of what really matters, performance, power, and price |
|
 DaveDudeNo Fear
join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1 | That is very true, what about wireless N, who cares about the medium. I just want speed, and low latency. |
|
 TechnogeezAgape in amazement.Premium
join:2007-01-20 | reply to cornelius785
I don't understand why you don't understand... |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000 | reply to cornelius785
said by cornelius785:I don't understand this fanboy-ism of ftth vs fttn. ...snip... that the lose sight of what really matters, performance, power, and price how about using your list of what really matters and compare U-Verse to a FTTH option. i'd love to see the results and how you don't see why people here are upset about AT&T's technology choices. |
|
