glinc
join:2009-04-07
New York, NY | dang is it available in nyc? |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by glinc:is it available in nyc? UTOPIA = Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency |
|
 baineschile2600 ways to livePremium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI | I thought Utah was just across the street from Williamsburg in Brooklyn? Am I wrong??? |
|
|
|
Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T Southeast
| reply to glinc
said by glinc:is it available in nyc? i have noticed something here when faster net speeds come up here.
why is it that when people are from nyc they think they should get fastest internet than anyone else? what makes nyc special?
Not everyone LIVES IN NYC YOU KNOW.  |
|
glinc
join:2009-04-07
New York, NY | hahaha, this is where all the business is man!! that's why we should get all the speed we can lol |
|
| LOL im sure BRONX and Queens is all business too right? NEXT. |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
 ·Frontier FiOS
| reply to hayabusa3303
said by hayabusa3303:why is it that when people are from nyc they think they should get fastest internet than anyone else? what makes nyc special? NYC by far has the highest population density of any US city. If an ISP is looking for the most bang for the buck, deploying there is going to access the most number of subscribers with the least amount of physical plant costs. One of the biggest expenses of deploying new technology such as fiber is the labor and material costs to get the fiber to the home. If you can hit more homes in a smaller area, it means lower deployment costs.
Plus, ~20m live in the NYC and surrounding communities. That's 1/15 of the coutry's population. Odds are very favorable that more then one or two people posting here are in the metro area and would want to have those speeds. It's no different then people in smaller cities wondering when they will be getting such access, just that there are more people in NYC so their inquiries would naturally be more numerous. |
|
1 edit | reply to hayabusa3303
Although it's funny that you say that because it is the BRONX (and the rest of CV's footprint) that is getting OOL's 101MB service.
Why do people in NYC think they should have the fastest internet? Why not, doesn't everybody want fast internet? Being the most populated city in the U.S. helps as well.
edit:didn't see cdru's post below me. |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Southeast
1 edit | said by Anaerobic:Why do people in NYC think they should have the fastest internet? Why not, doesn't everybody want fast internet? would be funny as hell 100/100 connection with a 250g cap.
Of course two isp there would have the same cap because they know they can screw with ALOT of people because there is no other connection you can get there. (talking about wired or fiber)
said by Anaerobic:Although it's funny that you say that because it is the BRONX (and the rest of CV's footprint) that is getting OOL's 101MB service. o yes looks at the start up fee »Cablevision 101Mbps: $300 'Activation Fee' |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to cdru
Sure have that many people in one area have only a few isp in the area have caps hit and people have no where to turn.
Hell if i was a ISP up there i would put the screws up there, look at all the money to be made off caps. Then the rest of the country could be cap free then. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to hayabusa3303
said by hayabusa3303:would be funny as hell 100/100 connection with a 250g cap. I don't think so. Just because you can download something faster doesn't mean you'd suddenly start downloading more. |
|
| said by Matt:said by hayabusa3303:would be funny as hell 100/100 connection with a 250g cap. I don't think so. Just because you can download something faster doesn't mean you'd suddenly start downloading more. Actually that is under the assumption than higher speeds are used for download.
What if higher speeds are used for streaming or other applications? |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to Matt
said by Matt:said by hayabusa3303:would be funny as hell 100/100 connection with a 250g cap. I don't think so. Just because you can download something faster doesn't mean you'd suddenly start downloading more. look at the 360 and netflix(example) and other services that are coming online so YES you will use more when services like that come to the masses. internet is not for geeks anymore.
You never know what is next in the pipeline coming out. You already have 1080p downloading what about when 3D launches? Xbox has already talked about that so that eats up MORE bandwidth. So yes content gets better and BIGGER you download MORE. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by hayabusa3303:said by Matt:said by hayabusa3303:would be funny as hell 100/100 connection with a 250g cap. I don't think so. Just because you can download something faster doesn't mean you'd suddenly start downloading more. look at the 360 and netflix(example) and other services that are coming online so YES you will use more when services like that come to the masses. internet is not for geeks anymore. You never know what is next in the pipeline coming out. You already have 1080p downloading what about when 3D launches? Xbox has already talked about that so that eats up MORE bandwidth. So yes content gets better and BIGGER you download MORE. I use all that right now. Just because I upgrade to 100Mbps symmetrical doesn't mean I'll suddenly start watching more movies or gaming more. I'll just be able to do it more easily. |
|
| maybe not for you, but other people would. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by hayabusa3303:maybe not for you, but other people would. I simply don't think that's true and I've never seen any evidence, either directly or indirectly, that proves otherwise. |
|
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Southeast
| said by Matt:said by hayabusa3303:maybe not for you, but other people would. I simply don't think that's true and I've never seen any evidence, either directly or indirectly, that proves otherwise. This is NEW ground here of course there is no evidence with speed that high. |
|
