<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Funny...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22378815</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:34:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Funny...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380798</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Still, DOCSIS 3 <i>is</i> available, and 50/10 from Comcast would be $140 per month so the math works out in OOL's favor after a year.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:42:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Funny...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380726</link>
<description><![CDATA[RARPSL posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1440579" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1440579');">iansltx</a>:</small><br><br>Just look at OOL...they now have DOCSIS 3 available everywhere.  <br> </div>If you are willing to pay them a $300 bribe to turn it on for you. This is in addition to a $35 fee to hand deliver the new DOCSIS3 Modem to you and hook it to your existent coax where you current modem is connected. I am willing to say the fee is probably justified since the visit allows the tech to test your line and verify that everything is working (something that is not possible with a self-install where they hand you the modem at a store front [or mail it to you] and you plug it in yourself). The extra $45/month (over the 30/5 Boost Tier rate) is not an issue since that pays for you getting the 101/15 tier.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380726</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:11:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Funny...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380511</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Comcast has a bigger footprint, but also has more customers. Knology has a smaller fooprint, but also has less customers. Though you're right, smaller companies can probably apply upgrades in a quicker fashion. Just look at OOL...they now have DOCSIS 3 available everywhere. Try that with Comcast. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22380511</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:12:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Funny...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22378908</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1440579" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1440579');">iansltx</a>:</small><br><br>Knology's laid-back attitude would be called "aggressive" by the likes of Comcast...they too will be finished deploying DOCSIS 3 in 2010...<br> </div>I disagree. Just because Comcast will be done in 2010 doesn't mean squat. Comcast has a huge footprint compared to Knology.<br><br>Knology has no reason why they can't get their entire network upgraded to Docsis 3.0 by the end of this year. <br><br>Comcast is rolling Docsis 3.0 very quickly given their size. Could they go faster? Sure. But they are going at very quit pace - they are aggressive.<br><br>Knology is taking a really laid back attitude. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Funny-22378908</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:49:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Funny...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Funny-22378815</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Knology's laid-back attitude would be called "aggressive" by the likes of Comcast...they too will be finished deploying DOCSIS 3 in 2010...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Funny-22378815</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:31:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

