<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Time Warner Cable&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Time-Warner-Cable-22379043</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:09:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:09:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Time Warner Cable</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Time-Warner-Cable-22380787</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by GuyinLA :</small><br><br>Is TWC going to be the last to upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0?<br> </div>Last major operator in history, yes.<br><br>Im sure if you look hard enough you can find the rural cable co from hell that still uses DOCSIS 1.0 with dial up upstream.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Time-Warner-Cable-22380787</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:37:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Time Warner Cable</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Time-Warner-Cable-22379043</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Is TWC going to be the last to upgrade to DOCSIS 3.0?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Time-Warner-Cable-22379043</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

