 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to jameswade
Re: Assumptions.... said by jameswade:In today's technology, that's a recompress... What is? It helps if you quote what you're replying to. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Frontier Communi..
 ·US Cellular
| said by djrobx :
Karl, why are you assuming that this is even going to happen?
The U-verse set tops are not very powerful. They simply don't have the hardware needed to recompress the stream to something internet streamworthy on the fly.
Matt said -They don't need to. The stream is already MPEG-4 so all they need to do is lower the bitrate.
said by Matt:said by jameswade:James Wilson said - In today's technology, that's a recompress... What is? It helps if you quote what you're replying to. |
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by jameswade:said by djrobx : Karl, why are you assuming that this is even going to happen? The U-verse set tops are not very powerful. They simply don't have the hardware needed to recompress the stream to something internet streamworthy on the fly. Matt said -They don't need to. The stream is already MPEG-4 so all they need to do is lower the bitrate. said by Matt:said by jameswade:James Wilson said - In today's technology, that's a recompress... What is? It helps if you quote what you're replying to. No recompression is required, the streaming bitrate can be lowered on the fly. |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | Matt,
SLING can vary bitrates on the fly but what the OP is trying to state here is that the Uverse boxes can not. They would require dedication compression/encoding hardware (like sling has). You can't just take an Mpeg4 stream and "lower the bitrate" without transcoding/recompression. |
|
|
|
