 | reply to matcarl
Re: But what happens to rural customers offloaded to others Not really misleading, the author assumes the reader is bright enough to determine that fewer non-FiOS markets means the coverage percentage goes up automatically. |
|
 matcarlPremium join:2007-03-09 Franklin Square, NY 1 edit | It is misleading. The title reads "80% of Verizon's remaining customers may get fios." The 80% will already exist. The title makes it seem like 80% of those who don't have it now will get it. |
|
 BitPremium join:2009-02-19 00000 3 edits | The claim is now that more of the rural subs have been dumped, the of the remaining Verizon subs who don't yet have FiOS, 80% will eventually get it or that 80% of all subs will have FiOS available since some never-would-be-serviced rural subs were dumped.
EDIT - I'm confused. |
|
 | The 80% is after the elimination of these rural markets and upcoming plans to push deployment past 18 million homes.
Confusing, maybe. But not misleading.  |
|
|
|
 BitPremium join:2009-02-19 00000 | Cause the way I read your portion of the item is that 80% of the current VZ subs who don't have FiOS available would be getting it when the Verizon quoted portion appears that they mean 80% of the overall Verizon footprint would have FiOS available, including places that currently have it. |
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | reply to Karl Bode said by Karl Bode:The 80% is after the elimination of these rural markets and upcoming plans to push deployment past 18 million homes. Confusing, maybe. But not misleading. What about the FIOS passed premises that will be spun off? Are those accounted for? Verizon might actually loose FIOS coverage % if you include the FIOS passed houses being sold off (OR/WA/CA/IN). |
|
 Mark F join:2007-08-01 Fort Wayne, IN | reply to Karl Bode And, devastating, just the same. Just what we Hoosiers don't need or want. Mark F. |
|