 Mr Matt join:2008-01-29 Eustis, FL kudos:1 Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..
·Millenicom
| Try a time machine! If you take a ride back in a time machine to the 20's and 30's, you will find that most rural telephone service provided by Cooperatives! The Cooperatives were financed by low interest Rural Electrification Administration Loans.
With the Senate and Congress in the back pocket of the Broadband ISP's, I do not hold out to much hope for deployment of rural broadband soon. |
|
 me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | said by Mr Matt:  If you take a ride back in a time machine to the 20's and 30's, you will find that most rural telephone service provided by Cooperatives! The Cooperatives were financed by low interest Rural Electrification Administration Loans. With the Senate and Congress in the back pocket of the Broadband ISP's, I do not hold out to much hope for deployment of rural broadband soon. Y can they not do something like that with broadband?
Ya know it makes me wonder how, WISPs can stay in business where it is not profitable enough for the big ISPs? |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | said by me1212:Ya know it makes me wonder how, WISPs can stay in business where it is not profitable enough for the big ISPs? Two words: Stock Holders
Actually, three words: Impatient Stock Holders |
|
 me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | Makes since. I am just happy my WISP works as well as a wired ISP. Too bad they wont let me get the next speed package, it would oversell them too much. |
|
|
|
 | reply to me1212 said by me1212:said by Mr Matt:  If you take a ride back in a time machine to the 20's and 30's, you will find that most rural telephone service provided by Cooperatives! The Cooperatives were financed by low interest Rural Electrification Administration Loans. With the Senate and Congress in the back pocket of the Broadband ISP's, I do not hold out to much hope for deployment of rural broadband soon. Y can they not do something like that with broadband? Ya know it makes me wonder how, WISPs can stay in business where it is not profitable enough for the big ISPs? A WISP is nothing like a major telco. You're comparing apples and oranges. Overhead costs and regulations are worlds apart. |
|
 Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
| reply to Mr Matt What would make more sense is to form a Co-Op that would pick up these areas and rewire them.
Many co-ops around the country are laying FTTH and many have been a TV provider for years, long before ATT and VZ even thought about doing it : »www.horizontechnology.net/ . based in Ohio and has been offering TV for at least 5 years now. |
|
 Mr Matt join:2008-01-29 Eustis, FL kudos:1 Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Comcast
·Embarq Now Centu..
·Millenicom
| reply to me1212 I am sure if rural residents tried to form a broadband cooperative the Cable and Telephone Companies would quickly move to have the lawmakers in their pockets write laws making formation of such a cooperative a violation of the law.
WISP's can stay in business because of low infrastructure cost. |
|
 openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | If the local cooperatives involve taxpayer funds backing them, then yes, the cable and telephone companies would likely cry foul...and rightfully so IMO. |
|
 | reply to me1212 The "last mile" for the Wisp is much cheaper than a land line company. For example, if you lived down a 1 mile road by your self the telco would have to either bury or string cable to your place. That would include pull boxes or telephone poles. The extra costs of labor and materials would be VERY expensive.
A Wisp only needs a good line of site (or NLOS for 900) to get you a connection. The cost of the install and equipment at your place would be well below $1,000 for every thing.
There are a few small rural Telcos using Wisp gear but very few. I am surprised that more are not using more wireless in their plant. |
|
 | reply to hottboiinnc said by hottboiinnc:What would make more sense is to form a Co-Op that would pick up these areas and rewire them. Many co-ops around the country are laying FTTH and many have been a TV provider for years, long before ATT and VZ even thought about doing it : » www.horizontechnology.net/ . based in Ohio and has been offering TV for at least 5 years now. The independents/co-ops are subsidized via USF, spending tons of money per subscriber, and getting to keep the returns. Meanwhile, the President and CEO are making good bank. Nice job, if you can get it. |
|
 me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | reply to battleop Hmm, I ain't surprised, with wireless you put up the tower and every1 in the line of site and signal area can get it. Would cost a lot less than burring a mile of wire.
"I am surprised that more are not using more wireless in their plant." You and me both dude. |
|
 Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
| reply to viperlmw VZ, ATT and Qwest are also get money from the USF so i don't see what the big deal is.
Horizon is the only one that has actually done anything really in terms of deploying anything on a more massive scale from what you can find. They have xDSL available for TV, they have faster DSL rates, and lower rates period. They actually compete with Cable on the terms of pricing and whats available. You don't see VZ or ATT even doing that. they just care about how much they can shove down your throat and claim you need it. |
|
 yaplejPremium join:2001-02-10 White City, OR | reply to openbox9 Rightfully so?! That's exactly how the phone companies got started! So it was OK to give a ton of money to build the phone companies networks, but now that we need another one to compete with them its not. Hmmm I can smell a double standard here. -- Open Source WAN Accelerator »trafficsqueezer.sourceforge.net/ |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | reply to openbox9 said by openbox9:If the local cooperatives involve taxpayer funds backing them, then yes, the cable and telephone companies would likely cry foul...and rightfully so IMO. cable and telco can't have it both ways, although they will try hard. either provide service to these areas or get the hell out of the way and let the community decide if they want to start a co-op. |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:4 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to yaplej said by yaplej:Rightfully so?! That's exactly how the phone companies got started! So it was OK to give a ton of money to build the phone companies networks, but now that we need another one to compete with them its not. Hmmm I can smell a double standard here. I can't find any evidence that the telephone companies started out with taxpayer funding. They didn't even become government regulated monopolies until 1934, some 57 years after Alexander Graham Bell formed the Bell Telephone Company.
And in 1913, AT&T faced their first government sanctioned anti-trust lawsuit.
Where do people come up with this stuff? -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 d_lBarsoomPremium,MVM join:2002-12-08 Reno, NV kudos:7 | I think the taxpayer funding idea is an urban myth that some people just want to believe. They cling to it as if it is their religion. |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | reply to me1212 There's actually the $7.2B (beeeeeeelllllion) broadband grant in the ARA. So yes something like Rural Electrification for broadband could happen. |
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | reply to me1212 said by me1212:said by Mr Matt:  If you take a ride back in a time machine to the 20's and 30's, you will find that most rural telephone service provided by Cooperatives! The Cooperatives were financed by low interest Rural Electrification Administration Loans. With the Senate and Congress in the back pocket of the Broadband ISP's, I do not hold out to much hope for deployment of rural broadband soon. Y can they not do something like that with broadband? It still exists. »www.usda.gov/rus/ |
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | reply to NormanS said by NormanS:Where do people come up with this stuff? The USF "govt taxes" that are collected built those phone networks, or the PUC imposed universal service regulations, which allowed AT&T to justify price increases by putting that money into a internal fund towards universal service buildout. |
|
 me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | reply to iansltx said by iansltx:There's actually the $7.2B (beeeeeeelllllion) broadband grant in the ARA. So yes something like Rural Electrification for broadband could happen. I know, but how do we know the ISPs will use that money to wire rural areas? The ISPs r trying to keep the money from the little guys who would wire rural areas. |
|