
how-to block ads
|
 Matt Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| Re: wireless networking said by jchambers28 :that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i I agree. I tried it as well and it was awful. I was only going through one floor and about 15 feet maybe. The issue was the reliability of the connection, not the max throughput that could be achieved. I eventually replaced the bridges with Motorola NIM-100 MoCA bridges and see a solid 100Mbps all day.
I could hit 280Mbps (802.11n Draft 2.0) but every 2-3 minutes the signal would get muddled and the rate would drop, causing a video pause. Actually, when the rate had to change at all, either decrease due to a interference and then when it cleared up and increased the rate again, I'd would experience problems. The 5GHz spectrum would help, so I hope they are deploying it there. | |
|   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: wireless networking Personally, I'd rather use Ethernet over powerline (Netgear HDX-101 or newer). I typically have ~100mbps to almost any outlet in my house (100mbps port, so ~70mbps throughput). The only issue occurs when there's something with a high load (microwave oven, vacuum, hairdryer). | |
|  |   jchambers28
join:2007-05-12 Alma, AR | Re: wireless networking 720P would be the highest quality achieved nothing more. | |
|  |  |  bsoft
join:2004-03-28 Boulder, CO
·Comcast
| Re: wireless networking 1080p Blu-Ray discs usually run around 30Mbps, which is well within the real-world performance of 802.11n (60+ Mbps).
You can get excellent quality 1080p video with H.264 at 15Mbps, so you could easily send three video streams simultaneously over 802.11n.
The major stumbling block is going to be interference, but there's a good chance that AT&T will be using the 5GHz band instead of the 2.4GHz band (802.11n can use either). | |
|  |   Matt Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| said by en102 :Personally, I'd rather use Ethernet over powerline (Netgear HDX-101 or newer). I typically have ~100mbps to almost any outlet in my house (100mbps port, so ~70mbps throughput). The only issue occurs when there's something with a high load (microwave oven, vacuum, hairdryer). The MoCA devices are much simpler and offer higher throughput. There is ZERO configuration required, you just plug them in and go. They are also not sensitive to load on the coax. As the other poster said, I see a solid 100Mbps all day long. | |
|  |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: wireless networking I have no issues with MoCA, however these devices are plug/play, no config required either. Its basically an ethernet bridge over 120V, usable at any outlet. My longest run is probably ~300' of wire (far end of house to circuit breaker and back over a different circuit, and I have ~70Mbps (~55Mbps thoughput) - and my electrical is aluminum :P | |
|  |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA | I've tried a few powerline adapters without success. The best throughput I was able to achieve was ~17 Mbps. This was in a house built in 2005. | |
|  | |  |
|