<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: wireless networking&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393335</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:34:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:34:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22400414</link>
<description><![CDATA[bsoft posted : 1080p Blu-Ray discs usually run around 30Mbps, which is well within the real-world performance of 802.11n (60+ Mbps).<br><br>You can get excellent quality 1080p video with H.264 at 15Mbps, so you could easily send three video streams simultaneously over 802.11n.<br><br>The major stumbling block is going to be interference, but there's a good chance that AT&T will be using the 5GHz band instead of the 2.4GHz band (802.11n can use either).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22400414</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 22:59:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22396495</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/201506" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=201506');">Skippy25</a>:</small><br><br>Though technically right.... just as you pointed out though compression has EVERYTHING to do with resolution quality.<br><br>No matter how good it is, you are going to loss details and the more compression the more details lost.<br> </div>I said resolution, not quality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22396495</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:03:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22396048</link>
<description><![CDATA[jchambers28 posted : my point of view is that you cant beat a wired connection for vidieo that's just it, my point of view.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22396048</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:16:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22395757</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Gaupo posted : sounds like a loser to me]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22395757</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:01:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394854</link>
<description><![CDATA[openbox9 posted : I've tried a few powerline adapters without success. The best throughput I was able to achieve was ~17 Mbps. This was in a house built in 2005.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394854</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:19:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394141</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skippy25 posted : Though technically right.... just as you pointed out though compression has EVERYTHING to do with resolution quality.<br><br>No matter how good it is, you are going to loss details and the more compression the more details lost.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394141</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394006</link>
<description><![CDATA[aaronwt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1458205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1458205');">jchambers28</a>:</small><br><br>that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i<br> </div>I have zero problems transmitting 1080P24 video over my 5Ghz wireless N segment of my network. I can transfer multiple streams with zero problems. I easily have consistent 100mbs+ speeds from it.<br>As long as it's setup properly there should not be any dropouts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22394006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:57:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393860</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : I have no issues with MoCA, however these devices are plug/play, no config required either.  Its basically an ethernet bridge over 120V, usable at any outlet.<br>My longest run is probably ~300' of wire (far end of house to circuit breaker and back over a different circuit, and I have ~70Mbps (~55Mbps thoughput) - and my electrical is aluminum :P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393860</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:30:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393640</link>
<description><![CDATA[yolarry posted : meh I cant get standard video working at all.<br><br>I don't know what I doing wrong.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393640</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:45:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393632</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/737897" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=737897');">dslwanter</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1458205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1458205');">jchambers28</a>:</small><br><br>that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i<br> </div>Never 1080i anyway. It's all compressed. But AT&T would do something like this.</div>Resolution has nothing to do with compression. You can have 1080i at 1Mbps if you want to. You won't be able to make out what is in the video, but it's still technically video. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393632</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:44:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393625</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/297537" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=297537');">en102</a>:</small><br><br>Personally, I'd rather use Ethernet over powerline (Netgear HDX-101 or newer).<br>I typically have ~100mbps to almost any outlet in my house (100mbps port, so ~70mbps throughput).  <br>The only issue occurs when there's something with a high load (microwave oven, vacuum, hairdryer).<br> </div>The MoCA devices are much simpler and offer higher throughput. There is ZERO configuration required, you just plug them in and go. They are also not sensitive to load on the coax. As the other poster said, I see a solid 100Mbps all day long.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393625</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:42:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393615</link>
<description><![CDATA[jchambers28 posted : 720P would be the highest quality achieved nothing more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393615</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:40:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393593</link>
<description><![CDATA[dslwanter posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1458205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1458205');">jchambers28</a>:</small><br><br>that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i<br> </div>Never 1080i anyway. It's all compressed. But AT&T would do something like this.<br><br>AT&T= You're world, our way.<br><small>--<br>Check our my internet radio station: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.thebomb102.com" >www.thebomb102.com</A>, featuring new music and hits of the millennium, powered by FTTH!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393593</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:34:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393571</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : Personally, I'd rather use Ethernet over powerline (Netgear HDX-101 or newer).<br>I typically have ~100mbps to almost any outlet in my house (100mbps port, so ~70mbps throughput).  <br>The only issue occurs when there's something with a high load (microwave oven, vacuum, hairdryer).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393571</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393504</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1458205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1458205');">jchambers28</a>:</small><br><br>that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i<br> </div>I agree. I tried it as well and it was awful. I was only going through one floor and about 15 feet maybe. The issue was the reliability of the connection, not the max throughput that could be achieved. I eventually replaced the bridges with Motorola NIM-100 MoCA bridges and see a solid 100Mbps all day.<br><br>I could hit 280Mbps (802.11n Draft 2.0) but every 2-3 minutes the signal would get muddled and the rate would drop, causing a video pause. Actually, when the rate had to change at all, either decrease due to a interference and then when it cleared up and increased the rate again, I'd would experience problems. The 5GHz spectrum would help, so I hope they are deploying it there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-wireless-networking-22393504</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wireless networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/wireless-networking-22393335</link>
<description><![CDATA[jchambers28 posted : that's some crazy shit I am doing that here and it don't work that great. there goes your 1080i]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/wireless-networking-22393335</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:37:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

