site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1264
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Forum FAQ ·Attitude Adjustment ·Linux docs ·DistroWatch ·OPLM ·FreeBSD Handbook
AuthorAll Replies

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21
kudos:2

1 edit

Chris Mason Interview - BTRFS Founder & Lead Developer

From Linux Magazine
May 12th, 2009 -
quote:
The founder of btrfs talks about features, terabyte raid arrays and comparisons with ZFS.

Following up our introductory article on “Butter FS” (See Linux Don’t Need No Stinkin’ ZFS: BTRFS Intro & Benchmarks - ZFS may be locked into the Solaris operating system but “Butter FS” is on the horizon and it’s boasting more features and better performance.), Jeff Layton talked with Chris Mason, Director of Linux Kernel Engineering at Oracle and the founder and lead developer of Btrfs.
Full interview at top link.


KodiacZiller
Premium
join:2008-09-04
73368
kudos:2

Thanks for the link. Btrfs is the future and it's always nice to see how it's progressing. I think a lot of casual Linux users don't understand how much Btrfs can improve their lives.



koitsu
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-16
Mountain View, CA
kudos:14

reply to SUMware
What I don't understand is the lack of RAID-5 equivalent, which ZFS does provide (via raidz1 or raidz2).

RAID 0, RAID 1, or RAID 10. So I'm forced to have an evenly divisible number of disks? Who has a 5 disk array?!?!? Oh wait, right, those servers with 6 disks where 1 is dedicated to the OS... "Oops".

I like following Linux, especially Btrfs's evolution, but I think this will be a big show-stopper unless a RAID-5 equivalent is added.

Some of the comments on the article are dead on, by the way. I'm not sure the author actually took the time to read about ZFS, how it works, or how to administrate it. The fact that it's a filesystem *and* an LVM equivalent in one, is one of many reasons ZFS is so beautiful. Linux's LVM is... well, let's just say I'd rather shoot myself in the face.
--
Making life hard for others since 1977.
I speak for myself and not my employer/affiliates of my employer.



Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Austin, TX
Reviews:
·Suddenlink

said by koitsu:

What I don't understand is the lack of RAID-5 equivalent, which ZFS does provide (via raidz1 or raidz2).

RAID 0, RAID 1, or RAID 10. So I'm forced to have an evenly divisible number of disks? Who has a 5 disk array?!?!? Oh wait, right, those servers with 6 disks where 1 is dedicated to the OS... "Oops".

I like following Linux, especially Btrfs's evolution, but I think this will be a big show-stopper unless a RAID-5 equivalent is added.
I read the article to mean it hasn't been implemented yet.
quote:
At this time, it can do RAID-0, RAID-1, RAID-10 but will be adding other RAID levels.
Agreed on the rest.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?

Friday, 01-Jun 00:21:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics