<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Cable vs DSL&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-vs-DSL-22400290</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:00:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Cable vs DSL</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-vs-DSL-22400290</link>
<description><![CDATA[jofallon posted : I was always one of those preferring (unmetered) DSL. Even at the $140 level, Comcast has the 250 gig cap. I wouldn't think it would matter; but I use CrashPlan for offsite backup, and <b>something</b> they do eats up bandwidth. Of course, half the benefit of 50 megabit download speeds falls apart with the cap. If I actually did video streaming from Netflix or whatever, my quota would disappear pretty quickly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cable-vs-DSL-22400290</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 22:23:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

