site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Bit
Premium
join:2009-02-19
00000

1 edit

reply to baineschile

Re: I'm happy with them

He's not right, it's pure conjecture.

You could say the same thing about every ISP or video service provider then. Why was Comcast at the bottom (ranked even lower than the IRS) and just now mediocre? Are Comcast subs just particularly stupid while Cox and DirecTV subs smart?


baineschile
2600 ways to live
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI

No, but Comcast subs have TV/Internet/Phone to deal with, so there is more potential for problems. The satellite guys only have 1 service.



Bit
Premium
join:2009-02-19
00000

2 edits

The index quoted by Karl was for cable and satellite television service. Telephone service was a separate ranking »www.theacsi.org/index.php?option···+Service and Comcast ranked last. Internet service wasn't ranked.


TooFastFlash

join:2009-04-26
Clarion, PA

reply to Bit

said by Bit:

He's not right, it's pure conjecture.

You could say the same thing about every ISP or video service provider then.
Not every ISP or video provider is as large a company as Comcast. It really comes down to how many subs the company actually has. The more subs, more than likely, more negatives come along.


Bit
Premium
join:2009-02-19
00000

If that were true, AT&T and Verizon would be doing worse in the telephony rankings since they are larger than Comcast. But just as Comcast is very near the bottom of video services, they rank at the bottom of telephony services.

It's not a size issue.


Thursday, 31-May 05:32:58 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics