<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Just Glad They increased speed by 50% in Shaw</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22413182</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:15:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:15:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22452170</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><b>ErikRP</b></A> : Like I suggested earlier, try downloading a large (75+MB) file and see what your speed is.  That's a more accurate, and more useful, indication of your true download speed.<br><br>Use a decent site, too.  Microsoft is a common favourite, or any site that has large drivers and is used to heavy downloads.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22452170</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:52:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22449887</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Haw,  The fact that your getting 15Mbps to Chicago in the speedtest seems to suggest your connection on most part is fine.<br><br>I ran same test from here in Edmonton to the Iron Mountain server you just tested on, and for what ever Reasons that server is dam SLOW(2.59Mbps).<br><br>Your may not get maximum speed to many test servers,  there are so many factors involved, ones even outside of Shaw's control.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22449887</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:48:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22446188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1518606"><b>JimmyArms</b></A> : Why don't you try posting in the Computer/tech forum on soonet and see if other people in your neighbourhood are having the same problem?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22446188</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:47:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22445989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/481927267.png"> </a><br><br>This test was done in safemode direct from pc to modem, as it was suggested to me Safemode is more accurate for testing. Though there isnt a comparable difference in speed.<br>There is nothing wrong with my equipment and the line is new from the modem to the pole. So cable internet must be really slow on this side of this city.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22445989</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22445656</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  murky <A HREF="/useremail/u/200606"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Here's my test for comparison. Same city as anonymous user, "haw"<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net/result/479988860.png" >www.speedtest.net/result/479988860.png</A><br>I realize that Shaw's boost effect is creating the wildly unrealistic download speed. Any test site that allows a longer test shows the speed that I should get; about 7.5 Mbps.<br>The Iron Mountain site is around 200 miles away and is the suggested site for Sault Ste. Marie  :)<br>This site gives a comprehensive report on your connection.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.measurementlab.net/" >www.measurementlab.net/</A><br>I've been over this with "haw" in his previous posting :(<br> </div>Well they say all is fixed here , I have never seen more than 4 meg from Iron Mountain or 15 meg from chicago even with Speedboost since. I have never seen speedboost kickin. <br><br>The east end sounds great that would be better than WARP here, 66meg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If they upgraded me to Warp I still wouldnt get that!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22445656</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:27:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22433155</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/200606"><b>murky</b></A> : Here's my test for comparison. Same city as anonymous user, "haw"<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net/result/479988860.png" >www.speedtest.net/result/479988860.png</A><br>I realize that Shaw's boost effect is creating the wildly unrealistic download speed. Any test site that allows a longer test shows the speed that I should get; about 7.5 Mbps.<br>The Iron Mountain site is around 200 miles away and is the suggested site for Sault Ste. Marie  :)<br>This site gives a comprehensive report on your connection.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.measurementlab.net/" >www.measurementlab.net/</A><br>I've been over this with "haw" in his previous posting :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22433155</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 12:41:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22421232</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><b>ErikRP</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by peateargriffin :</small><br><br>Maybe you should be using that test site then instead of the one you keep posting over and over again. </div>Shhhh.  Don't tell him that.  I've got a side bet with a few members that he'll post his speeds at least 100 times by the end of the month.   :D<br><br>Seriously though, some sites are just not reliable for speed testing.  How close they are doesn't necessarily mean anything.  I get amazing speeds on the U.S. west coast, but not so good in central Canada which is closer.<br><br>Bottom line - are you noticing that you are having trouble downloading, or viewing sites?  It doesn't matter what some speedtest tells you - it's just one site, and a snapshot in time.  Download a file or two and see how that goes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22421232</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:21:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417933</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by haw :</small><br><br>Here the PREFERRED server for testing is chigago at speakeasy.<br><br> </div>Maybe you should be using that test site then instead of the one you keep posting over and over again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417933</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:27:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417798</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477936568.png"> </a><br><br>At this moment chicago server is coming in fast but all others slow<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477938330.png"> </a><br><br>The shaw speedtest at shaw .ca is 768 kb]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:02:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417761</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by DetailsNeeded :</small><br><br>Could you post the unedited results of the following commands?<br><br>1]ipconfig /all<br>2]tracert google.ca<br>3]netstat -an<br>4]route print<br> </div>Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]<br>Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.<br><br>C:\Users\myself>ipconfig /all<br><br>Windows IP Configuration<br><br>   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : myself<br>   Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :<br>   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast<br>   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br>   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br>   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : su.shawcable.net<br><br>Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:<br><br>   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : su.shawcable.net<br>   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller<br>   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1E-4F-47-0F-3F<br>   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes<br>   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br>   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::7d08:b2c7:bba6:6d58%8(Preferred)<br>   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 24.109.73.88(Preferred)<br>   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.252.0<br>   Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:39:51 PM<br>   Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, May 22, 2009 9:50:47 AM<br>   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 24.109.72.1<br>   DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 64.59.176.40<br>   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 64.59.176.13<br>                                       64.59.176.15<br>                                       64.59.177.226<br>   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled<br><br>Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 6:<br><br>   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :<br>   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface<br>   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-00-54-55-4E-01<br>   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No<br>   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br>   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:0:4137:9e50:14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7(Prefe<br>rred)<br>   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7%9(Preferred)<br>   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :<br>   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled<br><br>Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 7:<br><br>   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected<br>   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : su.shawcable.net<br>   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.su.shawcable.net<br>   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0<br>   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No<br>   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br><br>Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 11:<br><br>   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : su.shawcable.net<br>   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : 6TO4 Adapter<br>   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0<br>   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No<br>   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br>   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2002:186d:4958::186d:4958(Preferred)<br>   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 2002:c058:6301::c058:6301<br>   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 64.59.176.13<br>                                       64.59.176.15<br>                                       64.59.177.226<br>   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled<br><br>C:\Users\myself>tracert google.ca<br><br>Tracing route to google.ca [64.233.161.104]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    10 ms     8 ms    21 ms  24.109.72.1<br>  2    21 ms    12 ms     9 ms  rd1sm-ge1-0.su.shawcable.net [64.59.180.1]<br>  3    19 ms    21 ms    30 ms  rc2sh-ge4-0.mt.shawcable.net [66.163.77.105]<br>  4    19 ms    32 ms    38 ms  74.125.49.69<br>  5    19 ms    43 ms    28 ms  216.239.47.116<br>  6    35 ms    37 ms    37 ms  72.14.236.218<br>  7    65 ms    44 ms    43 ms  209.85.249.11<br>  8    41 ms    54 ms    39 ms  64.233.175.109<br>  9    45 ms    44 ms    44 ms  216.239.49.214<br> 10    59 ms    44 ms    56 ms  od-in-f104.google.com [64.233.161.104]<br><br>Trace complete.<br>C:\Users\myself>netstat -an<br><br>Active Connections<br><br>  Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:135            0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:445            0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:5357           0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:49152          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:49153          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:49154          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:49155          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    0.0.0.0:49157          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    24.109.73.88:139       0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING<br>  TCP    24.109.73.88:49292     209.123.109.175:80     ESTABLISHED<br>  TCP    [::]:135               [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:445               [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:5357              [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:49152             [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:49153             [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:49154             [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:49155             [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  TCP    [::]:49157             [::]:0                 LISTENING<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:123            *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:500            *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:3702           *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:3702           *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:4500           *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:5355           *:*<br>  UDP    0.0.0.0:58660          *:*<br>  UDP    24.109.73.88:137       *:*<br>  UDP    24.109.73.88:138       *:*<br>  UDP    24.109.73.88:1900      *:*<br>  UDP    24.109.73.88:55055     *:*<br>  UDP    127.0.0.1:1900         *:*<br>  UDP    127.0.0.1:55056        *:*<br>  UDP    127.0.0.1:65003        *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:123               *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:500               *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:3702              *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:3702              *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:5355              *:*<br>  UDP    [::]:58661             *:*<br>  UDP    [::1]:1900             *:*<br>  UDP    [::1]:55053            *:*<br>  UDP    [fe80::14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7%9]:1900  *:*<br>  UDP    [fe80::14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7%9]:55054  *:*<br>  UDP    [fe80::7d08:b2c7:bba6:6d58%8]:1900  *:*<br>  UDP    [fe80::7d08:b2c7:bba6:6d58%8]:55052  *:*<br><br>C:\Users\myself>route print<br>===========================================================================<br>Interface List<br>  8 ...00 1e 4f 47 0f 3f ...... NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller<br>  1 ........................... Software Loopback Interface 1<br>  9 ...02 00 54 55 4e 01 ...... Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface<br> 14 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0  isatap.su.shawcable.net<br> 13 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0  6TO4 Adapter<br>===========================================================================<br><br>IPv4 Route Table<br>===========================================================================<br>Active Routes:<br>Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface  Metric<br>          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      24.109.72.1     24.109.73.88     20<br>      24.109.72.0    255.255.252.0         On-link      24.109.73.88    276<br>     24.109.73.88  255.255.255.255         On-link      24.109.73.88    276<br>    24.109.75.255  255.255.255.255         On-link      24.109.73.88    276<br>        127.0.0.0        255.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306<br>        127.0.0.1  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306<br>  127.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306<br>        224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306<br>        224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link      24.109.73.88    276<br>  255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306<br>  255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link      24.109.73.88    276<br>===========================================================================<br>Persistent Routes:<br>  None<br><br>IPv6 Route Table<br>===========================================================================<br>Active Routes:<br> If Metric Network Destination      Gateway<br> 13   1125 ::/0                     2002:c058:6301::c058:6301<br>  1    306 ::1/128                  On-link<br>  9     18 2001::/32                On-link<br>  9    266 2001:0:4137:9e50:14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7/128<br>                                    On-link<br> 13   1025 2002::/16                On-link<br> 13    281 2002:186d:4958::186d:4958/128<br>                                    On-link<br>  8    276 fe80::/64                On-link<br>  9    266 fe80::/64                On-link<br>  9    266 fe80::14a6:ef0:e792:b6a7/128<br>                                    On-link<br>  8    276 fe80::7d08:b2c7:bba6:6d58/128<br>                                    On-link<br>  1    306 ff00::/8                 On-link<br>  9    266 ff00::/8                 On-link<br>  8    276 ff00::/8                 On-link<br>===========================================================================<br>Persistent Routes:<br>  None]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417761</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:55:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417287</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477873587.png"> </a><br><br>Wifi at Sault Ste MArie Public Library]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22417287</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:26:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22416832</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Could you post the unedited results of the following commands?<br><br>1]ipconfig /all<br>2]tracert google.ca<br>3]netstat -an<br>4]route print]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22416832</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:08:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22416730</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ErikRP <A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You said he was able to get 13000, and now you're saying your neighbourhood is being throttled?  I can appreciate you're frustrated, but does that really sound logical?</div> He got 13000 a few times then left for another call saying he knew very little about computers.A throttle doesnt sound logical but neither does a consistent and fast upload with a slower download. What possibly could cause that?<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  ErikRP <A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>How did he connect to the internet?  I'm guessing he connected directly to the modem.  How do you connect - through a router?</div>We both connect threw the modem , I alway make sure my first computer is connected via  a network cable to the modem for testing<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  ErikRP <A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I'd suggest checking all of your settings, including (especially) your NICs and any other network settings, especially if you are going through a router?</div>I've checked all settings and I get these results through the modem.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  ErikRP <A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So you've had this problem for a while now.  Have you asked Shaw to drop you down to regular high-speed internet so you're at least not paying for speeds you're not seeing?<br>  Once you are getting the normal speeds for a regular high-speed connection you can ask them to put you back to Extreme</div>The day the service was first installed the installer said he had seen the same problem in 3 or 4 other homes in my neighbourhood.<br>I had high but then got a temporary upgrade to extreme hoping it would speed things up, but only the upload speed was noticably higher.<br><br>So now I need a wifi spot in sault ste marie I can check my laptop on to see if there is some strange problem.<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477804327.png"> </a><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22416730</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:51:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22415672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1104875"><b>ErikRP</b></A> : You said he was able to get 13000, and now you're saying your neighbourhood is being throttled?  I can appreciate you're frustrated, but does that really sound logical?<br><br>How did he connect to the internet?  I'm guessing he connected directly to the modem.  How do you connect - through a router?<br><br>I'd suggest checking all of your settings, including (especially) your NICs and any other network settings, especially if you are going through a router.<br><br>So you've had this problem for a while now.  Have you asked Shaw to drop you down to regular high-speed internet so you're at least not paying for speeds you're not seeing?  Once you are getting the normal speeds for a regular high-speed connection you can ask them to put you back to Extreme.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22415672</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:09:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22414962</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477462050.png"> </a><br><br>My neighbourhood must be getting throttled i had 4 meg with chicago earlier today and now this. <br><br>That might explain the higher upload if only the download gets capped or throttled.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22414962</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : My brand new laptop has the same problem.<br>Maby I should check it somewhere there is wifi or another shaw account.<br><br>The upload is always fine on all three computers though. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413964</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1614979"><b>adiabatic</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by haw  :</small><br><br>so his SHAW branded laptop must be logging into a different acount or tricked out in someway.<br> </div>I LOL'd.  Yeah, Shaw has specially configured laptops to avoid responding to customer complaints.   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413926</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413845</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : As others stated sounds like it is definitely going to be related to your systems.<br><br>If your sure its not software caused (virus, or software firewall) or so on.  Then you could possibly look at hardware like network card and so on. (possible negotiating problem?)<br><br>Non the less there is something that both your computers have in common that's causing your issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413845</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:33:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : 08LkL4yhL239 is the modem number and this is the extreme package 15 meg download.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413506</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:24:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Honestly , if someone would know what that would be I would.<br><br>We did these test simultanously , pulling the network cable from his and then putting it into mine and doing speedtests.<br><br>Here the PREFERRED server for testing is chigago at speakeasy.<br><br>But i've did all port tests with shaw support and still the speedtests are bad while showing no open ports.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413382</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:59:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413311</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1626308"><b>MJScott</b></A> : Not to be rude or sound mean, but Shaw has very clearly done everything they can do, and even proved that its not on there side. <br><br>The tech isn't logging into anything different on his laptop, if you saw him plug it into your modem, and he got the speeds, then the modem and everything on Shaw's side is fine. There are no special accounts to log into or anything like that. <br><br>Maybe you need to look at the fact that your doing something wrong when reformatting or setting up your computers. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413311</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:48:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Anyone from bell offering a deal, thats my only option. Bell is excellent here ,even on my computer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413218</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:26:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just Glad They increased speed by 50%</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413182</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Well today they came and changed the cable to the road and for 1 speedtest I had an 8 meg download and then the cabletech came in from the road and it dropped right back to 600kb .<br><br>So then he plugeed in his laptop to the modem and it got 13000 but then testing the same server on mine only got 1100 . retested that over and over and his woulod get better.<br><br>I may have something using 500 kb of bandwith but not 12 meg, so his SHAW branded laptop must be logging into a different acount or tricked out in someway.<br><br>My other computer I just formatted will not get that speed either.<br><br>So he said they could not help.<br><br><A HREF="http://www.speedtest.net"> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/477313670.png"> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22413182</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:17:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
