 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·ViaTalk
| [VOIPo] To start itemizing taxes and fees. Surprised nobody has mentioned this. It appears very soon Voipo will join the others in itemizing taxes and fees. Current contracts will be honored and anyone managing to get in before they update the billing system only pays the $3 they have now. So if you want them get them NOW.
Its a shame voip businesses had to start doing this. The flat rate model plans are so much easier to follow and understand.
See. »forums.voipo.com/showthread.php?···ost12107 |
|
 | Who says they "have to" do this? It is their choice to do so. Not every VoIP provider does it, or will do it. |
|
 PX EliezerPremium join:2008-08-09 Hutt River kudos:12 Reviews:
·voip.ms
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·Optimum Voice
·Gizmo5
| reply to dcurrey said by dcurrey: It appears very soon Voipo will join the others.... Thanks for the info. 
But not all the other companies have this.
CallCentric has no extra recurring fees or taxes except small 911 fee for US residents, and NY State sales tax for NY residents only.
Voip.MS has no extra fees or taxes.
Other examples as well.
So people should look at their options, and evaluate services, features, quality, and total costs. |
|
 ropeguruPremium join:2001-01-25 Mechanicsville, VA | reply to dcurrey Well, that just did it for me. Was looking at moving over from CallCentric, but right now that would push my monthly more than one I am currently paying. |
|
 usa2kBlessedPremium,MVM join:2003-01-26 Canton, MI kudos:3 Reviews:
·VOIPo
·WOW Internet and..
| reply to dcurrey "Today, 04:11 AM"
It was a very new post. I did read it about an hour ago. (When does Tim sleep!?!?) --
Jim, VoIP since 12/2002, VOIPo 2/7/2007 FAH-Tool ... Whales ... USA2K site ... Artist-247 |
|
 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·ViaTalk
| reply to PX Eliezer Others does not equal ALL.
Yes some still do it the old way for now. But we just lost another one that didn't itemize everything.
Yes they could just raise the so called recovery fee to say $6 to cover they expenses but then those that don't come close to the $6 in taxes/fee would raise hell. Up the base price everyone will raise hell and businesses fear revenue will be lost since company Z advertises lower base price. Its an old argument and it just goes round and round. I have given up on it, just no good solution. |
|
|
|
 | The solution is to compare prices taking into account all "taxes", "fees" and "recovery" costs. And compare the total, whether a provider charges such junk charges or not. |
|
 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·ViaTalk
| Without the FTC or some other government agency forcing this it just won't happen.
Yes the advertised price should be what you pay. Doesn't matter if its voip (USF), buying a car (destination charge) or getting oil change (oil disposal fee.) But I don't see it happening anytime soon. |
|
 | Cablevision's Optimum Voice charges a flat-rate with no add-on's for taxes, etc. If they can do it, anyone can. |
|
 PX EliezerPremium join:2008-08-09 Hutt River kudos:12 Reviews:
·voip.ms
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·Optimum Voice
·Gizmo5
|  Smarter than the average bear. |
said by josephf:Cablevision's Optimum Voice charges a flat-rate with no add-on's for taxes, etc. If they can do it, anyone can. They do, but their price is pretty high. I have one of their lines myself.
As has been said, have to look at the total cost, not the come-on price.
Car dealers are the worst. And while I have great sympathy for all the smaller car dealers that are now losing their franchises, and all their workers, the fact is that Detroit AND the dealers caused their own problems.
My last car buying experiences were bad enough that my wife and I both drive old cars (1992 and 1995) and will run them into the ground.
Anyway, people who buy Voip are smarter than the average bear, and smart enough to look at the TOTAL prices.
--------------------------------------
Jay Leno said---supposedly a true story---two teenagers left their bicycles at the entrance to a park because they saw a sign that said "No Peddlers" and thought that meant bicycles. The bikes were stolen. Leno said the teens deserved to get their bikes stolen for being so ignorant. |
|
 Reviews:
·VoicePulse
| said by PX Eliezer:said by josephf:Cablevision's Optimum Voice charges a flat-rate with no add-on's for taxes, etc. If they can do it, anyone can. They do, but their price is pretty high. I have one of their lines myself. Point was that VoIP providers *can* give a flat-rate price, without any additional charges. |
|
 PX EliezerPremium join:2008-08-09 Hutt River kudos:12 | Agreed. I share your wish that more did so. |
|
 burrisPremium join:2000-08-22 Miami, FL Reviews:
·VOIPo
| I think Tim made his point when he said ....
"Some providers choose a very conservative approach and handle things just as if they were a traditional telco. Some choose to ignore this completely. Others take a more aggressive, yet compliant approach (which is what were doing). Essentially, we collect/remit only what we have to. Anything thats still being challenged or things in states where its a gray area will generally not be collected. This is kind of the lesser of two evils. It leaves a small amount of liability since some of the gray area items could come up later, but it takes care of everything already in place."
Having come from the telco world, I personally know of some companies that shove most of the fees and taxes into their pockets. When/if they get caught, only then does it surface. Some of them you may have heard of and others are small local outfits I know of.
From experience, the tax regs are so complex and because they overlap across all the states and municipalities, that even the tax people auditing this have no idea about how it works.
Some friends still in the CLEC arena have indicated just how they function with their taxes when they either do it themselves or even when they outsource to one of the companies that only handles the tax process..
They make it so complex, much like the Federal Tax Code, that no one really knows what to do. |
|
 RockyBBPremium join:2005-01-31 Steamboat Springs, CO | reply to josephf said by josephf:said by PX Eliezer:said by josephf:Cablevision's Optimum Voice charges a flat-rate with no add-on's for taxes, etc. If they can do it, anyone can. They do, but their price is pretty high. I have one of their lines myself. Point was that VoIP providers *can* give a flat-rate price, without any additional charges. OOL is a bad example, as they have a very geographically limited operating area. VOIPo (and most others) are nationwide and have to deal with thousands of jurisdictions.
VOIPo today with a fixed blended $3 is a better example.
But here's the problem with that: with fixed pricing nationwide where vendor collects only what is necessary to pay all the taxes, someone living in a low tax area ends up subsidizing those living in high tax areas. If the NY taxes are $4, and the KY taxes are $2, and the blended rate is $3 ... then the KY people are paying too much, and the NY people aren't paying their fair share. You don't want others who don't know you to be paying your tax obligation, do you?
This also gives you some (minimal) control over your local taxes as you can elect officials that would rescind your telecom taxes. |
|
 usa2kBlessedPremium,MVM join:2003-01-26 Canton, MI kudos:3 | Perhaps a state by state flat rate? |
|
 2 edits | reply to RockyBB Cablevision serves some of the highest (telecom) taxed States in the nation. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | reply to dcurrey It was only a matter of time until this was going to happen. The $3 idea was good for launch, but that is it.
I think you will see it more and more in the VoIP world. |
|
 RockyBBPremium join:2005-01-31 Steamboat Springs, CO | reply to josephf said by josephf:Cablevision serves some of the highest (telecom) taxed States in the nation. then that would mean that if Cablevision started offering the same flat-rate priced service in a low tax state, then the customers of that new state would be paying too much for tax allocation, essentially subsidizing the customers of the high taxed state or enhancing CV profitability. This is why unbundling is most fair and equitable to all, though it is also frustrating to have to see it. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | reply to dcurrey Will this go into effect once we renew I assume? |
|
 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| reply to RockyBB From Tim's post:
Current Customers
We will honor our agreement with existing customers. All customers who currently have service or order service prior to this being fully implemented will be able to maintain the $3 flat rate bundled fee. |
|