<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Embarq NV&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Embarq-NV-22417786</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:11:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:11:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22420519</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : If they actually are better and can provide some competition for Cox, I'll be ecstatic. However, after years of nothing from both Sprint and Embarq, I'm sure you can understand why I'm skeptical.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22420519</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22419599</link>
<description><![CDATA[GeekJedi posted : Oh, I can certainly read.<br><br>I mention it because I'm fairly sure that you've already passed judgment when CenturyTel is a much different (read better) company than Embarq.<br><small>--<br>The goal of the broadcast engineer is to get all the meters on the transmitter to go as far to the right as possible!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22419599</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:01:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22419213</link>
<description><![CDATA[Go Tarheels posted : The exact reason you are still on 1.5, was your expanding city.  The techs couldn't lay the fiber fast enough.  There have been A LOT of upgrades in Vegas.  I know that doesn't mean much to you, but its not like the whole city was neglected.   I know of a major upgrade in Vegas now that is upgrading 1000's of customers to different dslams.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22419213</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:23:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418810</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarnellP posted : I get 10 Mbps DSL from Embarq at my location.  Go figure...<br><br>That, of course, is slower than the Cox 16 Mbps premier package, but a hell of a lot better than 1.5 Mbps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418810</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:09:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418701</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : They picked up a good chunk of Ohio with the purchase of Embarq as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418701</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:45:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418165</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I live in a town of 3,000 and have fiber - 15/1...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22418165</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:28:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417945</link>
<description><![CDATA[slappy white posted : Anything is possible. They hooked some pretty big fish with Embarqs Vegas and Orlando markets. They appear to be more aggressive than most...maybe those were the big chips in the game they were looking for. It will take some time, but if they keep Vegas they would have to see the upside in getting them at least 10M or better. Good Luck with that!<br><br>edit:<b> I just noticed your Air Force avatar. Thank You for your service.<b>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417945</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:29:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417905</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1559231" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1559231');">slappy white</a>:</small><br><br>Embarqs shortcomings in Vegas probably speak to the larger story of Embarqs problems. Maybe that is why they were acquired by a smaller company. I know CenturyTel currently has 10M and 20M products available in some of their larger markets...and by larger I mean large for them, nowhere near the size of Vegas. So CenturyTel seems to better understand serving urban markets...you may some worthy telco competition in your future after all. <br> </div>Forgive me if I'm skeptical, but Embarq (previously Sprint, atleast here) has been saying they plan to upgrade our dino city network for the longest. Meanwhile, our pals up in Reno are being fed U-Verse from AT&T. I'm jealous :)<br><br>Perhaps CenturyTel will upgrade, although it would appear that they have a long way to go. I'm hoping, based on the fact that CenturyTel is better with rural areas, that they'll just sell off the Vegas market.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417905</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:22:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417852</link>
<description><![CDATA[slappy white posted : Embarqs shortcomings in Vegas probably speak to the larger story of Embarqs problems. Maybe that is why they were acquired by a smaller company. I know CenturyTel currently has 10M and 20M products available in some of their larger markets...and by larger I mean large for them, nowhere near the size of Vegas. So CenturyTel seems to better understand serving urban markets...you may some worthy telco competition in your future after all. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417852</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:10:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417835</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/416162" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=416162');">GeekJedi</a>:</small><br><br>On the other hand I get 10000/768 from CenturyTel at my house, compared to the 8000/512 for the same price from Time Warner Cable.<br><br>Welcome to 2009?<br> </div>You live in a different city. I'm fairly sure the title of my post included "NV" as in Nevada, primarily Vegas, which has been a garbage telco market since the days of Sprint.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:07:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417812</link>
<description><![CDATA[GeekJedi posted : On the other hand I get 10000/768 from CenturyTel at my house, compared to the 8000/512 for the same price from Time Warner Cable.<br><br>Welcome to 2009?<br><small>--<br>The goal of the broadcast engineer is to get all the meters on the transmitter to go as far to the right as possible!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Embarq-NV-22417812</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:04:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Embarq NV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Embarq-NV-22417786</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : This merger is nothing more than two corporations who have no interest in investing in their broadband market. I can obtain 1.5 Mbps DSL at my location (welcome to 2000?) - meanwhile, Cox is offering 16 Mbps. I really wish they'd just sell off the Vegas market to AT&T or Verizon. You know it's pathetic when an internet provider treats a heavily urban area (the fastest growing in the nation, mind you) as if it were rural.<br><br>Not saying Cox is bad, but it would be nice to have some worthy telco competition here to give them a reason to implement DOCSIS 3.0.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Embarq-NV-22417786</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:00:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

