http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22206057 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:27:53 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:27:53 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22418094
We finally got dual WANs set-up in each location and the VPN tunnel working. So far so good. I am dropping VPN connection every once in a while, but it seems to come back up.

Todd]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22418094 Wed, 20 May 2009 16:01:48 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22217343 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22217343 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:21:38 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22206057
I'm helping a friend set-up a VPN tunnel between to offices. The plan is to use 2 of the FVX538s with dual WANs in each location.

My question concerns the private IPs in each location. My plan is as follows:

Location 1:
Router: 192.168.1.1
Static Range: 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.50
Dynamic Range: 192.168.1.100-192.168.1.199

Location 2:
Router: 192.168.2.1
Static Range: 192.168.2.10-192.168.2.50
Dynamic Range: 192.168.2.100-192.168.2.199

Am I approaching the addressing properly, or should I stick within the 192.168.1.x range and just spread out from there?

I've run through the online config tool and things seem fairly straight foward.

Thanks,
Todd]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Private-IP-question-when-using-FVX538-22206057 Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:32:07 EDT