republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
291
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

There is only one winner.

There is only one winner in these kinds of cases. It's not the consumer, it's not Hughes, it's the lawyers. Hughes is wrong for trying to enforce ETFs on service they can't deliver. If they could deliver the service as advertised then I would say that the consumer should suck it up or vote with their feet.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000

said by battleop:

There is only one winner in these kinds of cases. It's not the consumer, it's not Hughes, it's the lawyers. Hughes is wrong for trying to enforce ETFs on service they can't deliver. If they could deliver the service as advertised then I would say that the consumer should suck it up or vote with their feet.
uh, then how are the lawyers the only winners here? it's the consumers that will also win as they will be allowed to leave hughes since they cannot provide the service they advertise.

Saturday, 02-Jun 12:23:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics