site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

reply to BF69

Re: This is bad

said by BF69:

said by S_engineer:

This sets a horrible precedent...I hope its struck down. While there is contract law that may be in play here, suing every company that had bad service will have the reverse effect it seeks. Costs will rise for the consumer as these companies become liable and have to pay to defend themselves. This is a bad idea!
boy you can sure tell who works for whom by their posts can't you?
So you think I work for Hughes here in Chicago?...try some critical thinking!
This is clearly a money grab by opportunists. I could make the same claims about food at McDonalds being "tasty, credit card companies informing me of terms changes in a "timely manner", or politicians working in the best interests of its constituants. This underlines the fact that the public is largely uninformed about the services they buy, and that they refuse to rectify that matter. Everyone knew hughes wasn't reliable in their advertisments, which is the avenue for which this problem should be solved. Furthermore, this method isn't the first, here's some of the fearless ambulance chasers that have tryed this before. Please note the wide range of services they offer.
»www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/200···nst.html
--
"When I was in junior high school, the teachers voted me the student most likely to end up in the electric chair."---Sylvestor Stallone


BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by S_engineer:

So you think I work for Hughes here in Chicago?...try some critical thinking!
This is clearly a money grab by opportunists.
Talk about not thinking. Ok so it's ok for a company to BREAK a contract by not providing services it PRMOSIES to provide. Ok Einstein. God forbid a company should be made to uphold it's promises.

Let me ask you, is there EVER a time when it's ok to sue a company? Or is it ok for them to do whatever the fuck they like?


S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

technically, its providing those services. The problem is how the latency is measured. For Vsat is bits per million. So latency will be starts out higher relative to cable. This case will be hard to prove for the plaintiff.
As far as lawsuits go, yes there are times when it's necessary...I just don't think this is one of them.
By the way...may I suggest Midol for you!
--
"When I was in junior high school, the teachers voted me the student most likely to end up in the electric chair."---Sylvestor Stallone


hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

reply to S_engineer
they're nothing but a bunch of crooks who prey on the idiots of this country.


Saturday, 02-Jun 12:24:52 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics