wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·BroadVoice
| reply to BF69
Re: Here we go folks....
said by BF69  :said by wifi4milez :Regardless of how you feel about this, we can all expect to see a big increase in the taxes we pay to cover this upcoming fiasco. Money under the matress anyone?  Are you seriously that stupid? Are you seriously stupid enough to argue that a nationwide broadband plan that is "the biggest project the FCC has ever undertaken" wont raise taxes?? If so then I guess this is a rhetorical question for you....
said by BF69 :There will NEVER be a time where there won't be taxes to be paid. Exactly, so perhaps we should look at ways to CUT additional taxes from being added on??
said by BF69 :I get so sick of idiots that expect everything for free and somehow expect everything to magically get paid for without money. I 100% agree with that statement. In fact, I think this whole broadband plan is going to screw countless generations of Americans. It going to be the gift that keeps on giving (in a negative way), much like the rest of Obamas "initiatives". This is a bad idea, and if it was truly warranted it would be built out by private companies.
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-
|
|
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | My friend, you forget that most millennials believe that everything is free to begin with. Your logical points will be lost on most people in that generation.
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
wentlanc
You Can't Fix Dumb..
join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH
| reply to wifi4milez
said by wifi4milez :This is a bad idea, and if it was truly warranted it would be built out by private companies. It sure seems like private companies are dragging their asses as building out this infrastructure that you speak of. They sure want to get as much money out of the existing infrastructure as they can, and eliminate any competition that they can.
Since most ISPs are also content distributors, I for one believe that they should not have a monopoly over the delivery network. Let the infrastructure be run by public companies regulated by the PUC, and let these greedy idiots fight for the right to be a distributor of content.
cw |
|
wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice
| said by wentlanc :said by wifi4milez :This is a bad idea, and if it was truly warranted it would be built out by private companies. It sure seems like private companies are dragging their asses as building out this infrastructure that you speak of. Therein lies the dilemma. The reason the private companies havent built it is because its not profitable to do so. Hence, the government would be either forcing them to do it at a loss, OR the government would be spending OUR money on a money losing venture.
Take your pick, both options suck....
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-
|
|
wentlanc
You Can't Fix Dumb..
join:2003-07-30
Maineville, OH | I call bullshit on the fact that they cannot make a profit by creating an infrastructure. Why are they spending so much money on lobbying and lawsuits to prevent infrastructure by competitors??
cw |
|
Klinky
join:2002-05-30
Beaverton, OR
| reply to wifi4milez
Not profitable or more like they don't have to because there really isn't any competition in most areas? Who really has two cable companies to chose from or two phone companies to chose from in their area? Some don't even have competing telco & cable companies in their area.
It's real simple to keep pushing the same crap when there's no one else to turn to. It's either pay-up or live without & as time goes on the internet is become a very vital resource to most Americans. |
|
