| reply to e94mli
IKNS identified -- PPPoE session from MTL terminating in To? said by e94mli: US Connection Rate: 736 DS Connection Rate: 5056 DS Line Attenuation: 9 DS Margin: 24 US Line Attenuation: 20 US Margin: 6 US Transmit Power : 12 DS Transmit Power: 3 ATUC Vendor Code: 494B4E53 ATUC Revision: 2 Showtime Count: 2 DS Max Attainable Bit Rate: 11296 kbps ATUC ghsVid: b5 00 49 4b 4e 53 01 00 [Upstream (TX) Interleave path] CRC: 2 FEC: 3746 NCD: 0 LCD: 0 HEC: 68 YES!!!!!
494B4E53
You are the first to confirm what looks like a way for Aztech modem users to identity IKNS DSLAM devices.
Thank you! |
|
 Acanac PNAcanac SupportPremium
join:2008-10-27
Montreal, QC |  clarification
49=I
4B=K
4E=N
53=S
494B4E53=IKNS |
|
| And now explain IKNS... I've seen IKNS mentioned in the forum a couple of times but I don't know of any DSLAM called IKNS, although I only know Alcatel and Ericsson so I might be lost. |
|
Acanac PNAcanac SupportPremium
join:2008-10-27
Montreal, QC | It should be some abbreviation but the meaning is type (brand) of CO equipment used in DSL . I think, it is Canadian made
For some reason, it behaves different than classic ones and creates some support troubles, as you see.
I am trying to find any official information on that as many people do.
On Bell site I've seen discussions where they claim that all IKNS-reported problems were minor and fixable by other means (something like this).
In two words:
The user is very close to CO but upstream is not synchronizing at full 800 and/or NM is shown very low, say 6dB.
Some strange interleave modem reporting on AL1 profiles and/or higher pings.
Unfortunately, 70% of cases I open recently seem to be in this category.
Best regards.
|
|
