| To HotBoi. I do understand to some extend where hotboiinc is coming from. he is looking at this from a purely capitalistic viewpoint. in a free market capitalistic world. he would be absolutely right. However, Bell does not exist in a capitalistic environment. they were given money by tax payers to build the network. and as such they don't deserve these same rights.
How would you like it, if you were working hard at your little private company, then.. some other startup with ties to the gvn't got 100 million $ in free money from gvn't then opened the same business as you, then drove you out of business with $$$ and government support? .. according to your theory. that would make it absolutely your own fault that you got crushed because you didnt have better ties with the gvn't and didnt have 100 million in the bank ready to compete?
I'm sorry but thats the EXACT... same thing thats happening right now to the small ISPs. the world isn't as black and white capitalistic view. theres a pretty huge shade of gray. that is tax payers money and the gvn'ts and how they use it. the problem here is the GVN"T and how they're NOT representing the CITIZENS. but they're representing the Shareholders/Stakeholders of huge monopolistic companies. all this stuff about cable dsl, and moto wireless canopy is moot and just beating around the bush. |
