Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Wireless Security » Wireless question
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
wireless port scan attacked ??? »
AuthorAll Replies

docrice

join:2008-03-31
Fremont, CA

reply to antdude
Re: Wireless question

There are several "name leaks" (if you want to call it that) which occurs with Windows-based systems. In the DHCP Request packet, the hostname of the system is sent as option 12 (in an Active Directory directory environment, this helps the DHCP server update DNS). If dynamic DNS is supported, the client may also try to register their hostname into the DNS server and these are observable via the DNS update queries from the client.

You also have the infamous "NetBIOS" services on UDP 137 and 138 (and optionally TCP 139 which is more or less replaced via TCP 445 these days). These are legacy NetBIOS service enumeration / discovery methods for NetBIOS name suffixes (which denote the service type, whether it's a Workstation service, a PDC, etc.) which generally aren't useful unless you're running an NT 4.0 domain (almost no one these days) or you need your internal network to announce itself in such a manner due to the lack of centralized service enumeration methods (such as DNS SRV records). The Browser service on UDP 138 is there to help populate your "network neighborhood" browse list as well as help in the selection of a Master Browser, etc. (in the NetBIOS sense). All the NetBIOS stuff can be disabled under your interface's IP properties under Advanced -> WINS. You'll need to do this for each individual interface.

SMB / CIFS connections are under the "File and Printer Sharing" option, but there really isn't a "leak" in this sense since having a network share doesn't mean the machine broadcasts its availability.

Windows also tends to give itself away when you have SSDP involved running over UDP 1900. You can look that up. In Vista, you also have Link Layer Topology Discovery and other IPv6 stuff which clutters the network, although it's nice to help draw a network route diagram at a basic level.
-
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Wireless Securitywireless port scan attacked ??? »


Sunday, 06-Dec 06:56:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [124] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· I need an OS...best place to buy? [Microsoft Help]
· More Hammond organ work [Electronics]