xenophon
join:2007-09-17
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Getting ahead of themselves
Biggest problem with most evaluations is that they don't test across the country with thousands of users. Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones..
[url]»/mspeed?domains=1[/url]
Here are laptop card results...
Speed Test Statistics - dslreports.com
Samples Down Upload
113 747 369 Sprint Mobile Broadband:
105 727 353 Verizon Wireless
28 622 374 Cingular: US mobile provider (ATT)
These results change all the time though. No provider consistently leads and all are sometimes on top. Wireless data is fickle.
ATT also misleads with their map. They show 2g/3g coverage combined. They have much less national 3G coverage than Sprint/Verizon. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
1 edit | I'll agree with you on that there is no provider will consistently lead in every market across the country.
AT&T's 3g map shows 3g vs. 2g - but they do have less national 3G coverage than Sprint and Verizon, but more than T-Mobile.
Both Sprint and AT&T are pretty decent where I am in SoCal.
I've 'peaked' out at ~1.2Mbps on Treo 800w (EVDO Rev A). I haven't used data in months on HTC Tilt, as work pays for the Treo. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to xenophon
said by xenophon  : Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones.. [url]» /mspeed?domains=1[/url] The dslreports mobile test numbers are valuable, but they don't measure just 3g speeds. They also include the older 2g speeds as well.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
xenophon
join:2007-09-17
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
1 edit | said by TKJunkMail :The dslreports mobile test numbers are valuable, but they don't measure just 3g speeds. They also include the older 2g speeds as well. True, is the same for all though so factoring it is still mostly negligible. If you average all the speeds over 500Kbps, they still all come out to be about the same, with one carrier on top one day, another carrier another day.
Wireless depends on so many factors that are not in control of the carrier. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| That's why most carriers state 'average' speeds 500-800kbps  All I care that is
a) it works WHERE I need it
b) it works WHEN I need it
c) it doesn't cost a truck load of $$$
d) ToS doesn't turn a service into a useless item (eg. I'd like to use Skype)
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to xenophon
Biggest problem with most evaluations is that they don't test across the country with thousands of users. Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones.. Problem with that: When I run a test through my AT&T 3G phone, it regularly reports the domain was "myvzw.com" or some other strange, non AT&T domain.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.
|
|
