republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: Getting ahead of themselves

Biggest problem with most evaluations is that they don't test across the country with thousands of users. Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones..

[url]»/mspeed?domains=1[/url]

Here are laptop card results...
Speed Test Statistics - dslreports.com

Samples Down Upload
113 747 369 Sprint Mobile Broadband:
105 727 353 Verizon Wireless
28 622 374 Cingular: US mobile provider (ATT)

These results change all the time though. No provider consistently leads and all are sometimes on top. Wireless data is fickle.

ATT also misleads with their map. They show 2g/3g coverage combined. They have much less national 3G coverage than Sprint/Verizon.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

1 edit

I'll agree with you on that there is no provider will consistently lead in every market across the country.

AT&T's 3g map shows 3g vs. 2g - but they do have less national 3G coverage than Sprint and Verizon, but more than T-Mobile.

Both Sprint and AT&T are pretty decent where I am in SoCal.
I've 'peaked' out at ~1.2Mbps on Treo 800w (EVDO Rev A). I haven't used data in months on HTC Tilt, as work pays for the Treo.



fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to xenophon

said by xenophon:

Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones..

[url]»/mspeed?domains=1[/url]

The dslreports mobile test numbers are valuable, but they don't measure just 3g speeds. They also include the older 2g speeds as well.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

1 edit

said by fAcEtIOUs:

The dslreports mobile test numbers are valuable, but they don't measure just 3g speeds. They also include the older 2g speeds as well.
True, is the same for all though so factoring it is still mostly negligible. If you average all the speeds over 500Kbps, they still all come out to be about the same, with one carrier on top one day, another carrier another day.

Wireless depends on so many factors that are not in control of the carrier.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

That's why most carriers state 'average' speeds 500-800kbps All I care that is
a) it works WHERE I need it
b) it works WHEN I need it
c) it doesn't cost a truck load of $$$
d) ToS doesn't turn a service into a useless item (eg. I'd like to use Skype)
--
Canada = Hollywood North



djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER

reply to xenophon

Biggest problem with most evaluations is that they don't test across the country with thousands of users. Dslreports.com has a great archive of users across the country. Looks like Sprint leads for cellphones..
Problem with that: When I run a test through my AT&T 3G phone, it regularly reports the domain was "myvzw.com" or some other strange, non AT&T domain.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.

Thursday, 31-May 15:38:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics