<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Backhaul and Middle Mile&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Backhaul-and-Middle-Mile-22453390</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:16:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:16:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Backhaul and Middle Mile</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Backhaul-and-Middle-Mile-22453390</link>
<description><![CDATA[mr sean posted : With only 27% (estimated) coverage in rural areas, the problems of backhaul need to be addressed. At least they're thinking about solutions...<br><br> <blockquote><small>said by report :</small><hr>There is no one solution to addressing middle mile transport costs in rural areas. Commenters suggest explicitly encouraging middle-mile buildout, revising universal service funding to help cover costs of the middle-mile, and using current or potential infrastructure more effectively by coordinating with other infrastructure projects to shrink deployment costs, and reforming interconnection obligations. Others suggest that these facilities be offered at cost-based or favorable rates on nondiscriminatory terms and conditions.<hr></blockquote><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/ml/cutoff.wav">How  you can make the world a Better Place</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Backhaul-and-Middle-Mile-22453390</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:05:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

