republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Court Upholds FCC Apt. Exclusivity Ban » Yea so
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
what's in it »
« What about the other way around.  
AuthorAll Replies


meister_sd
Premium
join:2006-01-29
La Mesa, CA

reply to Joe12345678
Re: Yea so

said by Joe12345678 See Profile :

said by RadioDoc See Profile :

The property owner or their agent has to give permission for the initial installation of the cable line (or satellite dish for that matter) for liability reasons. That has nothing to do with this ruling.
no you have the right to your own dish and the owner can't say no by fcc law.
You are correct, but the manager can put limits on it - such as the dish cannot go on the roof, or the top of the dish cannot extend past the roof, etc...


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by meister_sd See Profile :

said by Joe12345678 See Profile :

said by RadioDoc See Profile :

The property owner or their agent has to give permission for the initial installation of the cable line (or satellite dish for that matter) for liability reasons. That has nothing to do with this ruling.
no you have the right to your own dish and the owner can't say no by fcc law.
You are correct, but the manager can put limits on it - such as the dish cannot go on the roof, or the top of the dish cannot extend past the roof, etc...
Or cannot be attached to specific parts of the property, especially "common areas."

unoriginal

join:2000-07-12
San Diego, CA
reply to meister_sd
I mounted my dish to a fence post that I then planted in a 5 gallon bucket full of quikrete. It was never attached to the building and entirely within my small balcony at the time so the management never had any reason to give me grief.

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
reply to meister_sd
The limits they can put on them is defined in the law. The landlord cannot modify these limits regardless of what they want.

markopoleo

join:2003-04-02
Bonne Terre, MO
·Charter Pipeline


1 edit
said by Skippy25 See Profile :

The limits they can put on them is defined in the law. The landlord cannot modify these limits regardless of what they want.
Actually we can. The law does not apply to a lease signed by the tenant, it which case you can include such language that makes it so you can't have dishes at all.

We do in some apartments/condos we have simply because having a dish at all would require more effort than its worth (roof mounted, long cable runs under ground, etc).

This ruling does nothing for most of rural areas anyways, since no such contracts existed in the first place with providers. Even then, only one provider is around.


Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

said by markopoleo See Profile :

Actually we can. The law does not apply to a lease signed by the tenant, it which case you can include such language that makes it so you can't have dishes at all.
I find it very surprising - and almost unbelievable - that a lease or a contract could trump law, even in the US. Around here, the law overrides any illegal language in a lease. As an example, if a landlord put a "No Pets" clause in a lease up here, it's void, as the law specifically protects a tenant's right to have a pet. If they include fees for things that are more than what are defined under law, they're also illegal and unenforceable, etc.
--
I swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.
-
Forums » Court Upholds FCC Apt. Exclusivity Banwhat's in it »
« What about the other way around.  


Friday, 27-Nov 11:49:18 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [116] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [59] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]