republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Still Can't Force Arbitration Via Fine Print » Abitration is a scam
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Shelleyp

@sbcglobal.net

from:
viperlmw See Profile
loadmaster See Profile

reply to ptrowski
Re: Abitration is a scam

No, I'm not a lawyer. My name is Shelley Powers. I write about technology for a living. I also happen to be a passionate supporter for consumer rights. Enough so that I took the time to understand the issues.


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day

join:2006-07-30
Ocean Gate, NJ


1 edit
Class actions are the lesser of two evils. Are 500,000 people going to individually hire a lawyer and go after AA&T (or whoever) for the less than $100 dollars that they owe them? Are those people going individually sue for the shit service they received? No.

You can bring up weak class action suits like the Airborne class action all day long. But without class action suits companies are made to be responsible, where they would not normally be if individuals had to sue to get what is due to them.


pepe382104

@northwestern.edu

reply to Shelleyp
You should definitely get a second opinion. The truth is, the vast majority of class action lawsuits do not benefit the consumer in a significant fashion and favor the attorneys monetarily. There's nothing wrong with looking our for the rights of the consumer as look as you do it objectively and in an informed manner.

ross

join:2000-08-16
·Digizip

reply to TK Junk Mail
said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

Class actions are the lesser of two evils. Are 500,000 people going to individually hire a lawyer and go after AA&T (or whoever) for the less than $100 dollars that they owe them? Are those people going individually sue for the shit service they received? No.

You can bring up weak class action suits like the Airborne class action all day long. But without class action suits companies are made to be responsible, where they would not normally be if individuals had to sue to get what is due to them.
Don't you mean "WITH"?


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day

join:2006-07-30
Ocean Gate, NJ

said by ross See Profile :

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

Don't you mean "WITH"?
LoL. Yes, with.
-
Forums » AT&T Still Can't Force Arbitration Via Fine Print


Tuesday, 01-Dec 00:04:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [55] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [45] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [32] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [28] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [24] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [21] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [3] Monday Morning Links
· [2] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Download speeds very slow. [AT&T West]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]