<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>set top boxes or recievers in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22457347</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:16:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:16:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: set top boxes or recievers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22460156</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1412457"><b>ILpt4U</b></A> : Both Cisco & Motorola receivers are out there. Which model you get depends on which market you are in. The Chicago & Atlanta markets are the only 2 that launched Moto & then switched to Cisco. Any markets that launched before Chicago & Atlanta still use Motorola Boxes, and any market that launched after Chicago & Atlanta use Cisco boxes.<br><br>All things being equal, the 2 makes are practically identical. The Cisco boxes are slightly smaller, but other than that, they run the same software, same inputs & outputs, same functionality, same interface -- very similar equipment.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22460156</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:59:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: set top boxes or recievers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22457870</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/747114"><b>TheGhost</b></A> : Yes, STBs are now made by Cisco. It is my understanding that at&t is switching to them - increased reliability is what I was told. They are definitely smaller than the old Comcast Motorola STBs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22457870</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>set top boxes or recievers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22457347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : did you say the recievers are cisco?i thought they were motorola.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22457347</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:02:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
