me1212
join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO | reply to djrobx
Re: isn't pursuit of metered billing a little like this? What about fixed wireless? The speed does not HAVE to be next gen, would you rather have a 50/? with a 250GB(or less) cap or a 5/?-10/? with no cap? |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Personally - I'd try fixed wireless if the price / bandwidth /caps (no cap) were decent.
Problem is that its hard to find, and typically not cheap.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
|
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | reply to me1212
said by me1212:What about fixed wireless? The speed does not HAVE to be next gen, would you rather have a 50/? with a 250GB(or less) cap or a 5/?-10/? with no cap? Fixed wireless is dead. All the equipment has "rape the business customer with allusions to SLA reliability" prices.
»www.google.com/products/catalog?···-sellers
What about spectrum? Verizon and ATT will buy anything that comes along, and sit on it for decades, kindda like Sprint is doing with its WiMAX spectrum. There is little to no spectrum except for ex-TV channels, and the media lobby groups are making sure whitespace is dead, and ATT/Verizon will buy anything that goes to auction, and with todays "fiscal responsibility" granting away spectrum on merit to small businesses is a political death penalty. |
|
me1212
join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO | reply to en102
I know what you mean about price, I use a fixed wireless. Cost $45 a month for 512/128 I get about 500/256 94% of the time, with no cap. |
|
