 hhawkmanPremium
join:2001-02-08
Port Hueneme, CA | Pay Less, my A** "I still think the use-less-pay-less and use-more-pay-more model can work."
No, the model they REALLY want is "use-less-pay-same and use-more-pay-more " |
|
|
|
 HpowerRoflmao
join:2000-06-08
Glendale, CA | said by hhawkman:"I still think the use-less-pay-less and use-more-pay-more model can work." No, the model they REALLY want is "use-less-pay-same and use-more-pay-more " Yup. Frigging corporate greed. Honestly with the way things are going, I think more people are going to ditch their TV and just stick to internet use. Let's hope TWC doesn't totally blow it with 4GB caps per month on 50mbps connection rofl.
--
The Internet is about to go down....it is actually. |
|
elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA Reviews:
 ·SONIC.NET
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to hhawkman
said by hhawkman:"I still think the use-less-pay-less and use-more-pay-more model can work." No, the model they REALLY want is "use-less-pay-same and use-more-pay-more " I would pay less under TWC's proposal. So would all of my kinfolk. A lot less.
Their mistake was not publishing the pricing data until after the firestorm.
Bandwidth may be cheap, but it is not infinite, nor does it approach infinite at consumer rates. We will either have throttling, caps, or inflated, cross-subsidizing access rates.
I know that TWC's true motivation is to thwart video competition, but I have no problem with paying less. |
|
