site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Lowtarget
Premium
join:2003-12-22
Alger, OH
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

1 edit

reply to amungus

Re: translation

I wounder if TWC thinks we are all confused. The ones who gave some backlash on metered billing. My self I don't feel the 5GB-40GB plans they was planning is fair.

My self I like streaming old tv shows off hulu. Which no longers plays on tv anymore. We all know if you watch alot of streaming videos. That tends to use alot of bandwidth. I'm not a major bandwidth hog by all means. Sofar the most bandwidth I used in a single months was like 120GB.

If TWC would give like 250GB bandwidth plan. That will be more then enough for my needs.


maartena
Elmo
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DIRECTV

Agreed. If TWC would simply match the 250 Gb plan that Comcast is using (who is also way ahead of TWC in rolling out DOCSIS 3.0, Powerboost, and higher speeds in general) I don't think we would have all this backlash.

40 Gb is way too little, and even 100 Gb as the "premium plan" is simply a joke.

We have seen so many topics on the issue, and TWC has pretty much burned themselves with the way they handled things, and are now going to lose customers over it if they try again with a cap that is anything less then 100 Gb.
--
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!"


Thursday, 31-May 06:03:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics