InvalidError
join:2008-02-03
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
 ·Videotron
| reply to jfmezei
Re: Status of 2008-108 Throttling Review and Vary
said by jfmezei  :Commission staff notes that Vaxination has proposed that the cost studies requested by the Commission in support of its consideration of Bell Canada Tariff Notice 7181 be made part of this Part VII process. Commission staff considers that these cost studies do not relate to the issues raised in this proceeding, and hence they will not form part of the record of this proceeding. More proof that the CRTC is staffed by either morons or Bell sympathizers.
How is a cost study related to throttling any different than a cost study for UBB or providing ADSL2 to GAS? These are simply three facets of the same thing, they use the same infrastructure, wires, fibers and other facilities so all their costs are intrinsically linked to each other.
I guess this means we can look forward to the CRTC requesting separate cost study for each individual issue and with a 2+ month allowance each time, we will not be remotely close to seeing the end of this BS this year.
The CRTC needs to get its ass in gear, decisions made in geological time are incompatible with access to technology. The CRTC makes even the FCC look good. |
|
jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Beaconsfield, QC
·ELECTRONICBOX
| This may have to do more with process.
CRTC gave a june 30th deadline for comments on the R&V. The Cost study arrives July 10th.
By diassociating both, it allows the CRTC to proceed with this R&V without having to wait for the cost study.
My argument was that if ISPs are paying in full for bandwidth, then Bell should provision its network to provide said bandwidth without having any negative impact on others. And "paying in full" would be proven by the cost studies.
By the time the CRTC gets around to deciding on the R&V, they will have seen the cost study, and I suspect they alreaydy know that it will show that ISPs are paying in full for their bandwidth and then some. |
|
