 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12
1 edit | reply to nasadude
Re: Some info on Baker So she is guilty by association because her firm acquired a firm of which a former owner was indicted? Is this the "6 Degrees of Guilt by Association Game" or something? This guilt by association crap is tiring. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| I didn't say she was guilty of anything. I just pointed out the firm at which she is Vice President doesn't seem to have pro-consumer leanings and appears to do a lot of their business with the industries the FCC regulates.
I'm sure Ms Baker is itching to get on the commission and immediately start doing good for the consumer!  |
|
|
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by nasadude:I didn't say she was guilty of anything. I just pointed out the firm at which she is Vice President doesn't seem to have pro-consumer leanings and appears to do a lot of their business with the industries the FCC regulates. I think you'll find that is true of anyone appointed. We don't want another Michael Brown now do we? |
|
Reviews:
 ·DSL EXTREME
| said by Matt:said by nasadude:I didn't say she was guilty of anything. I just pointed out the firm at which she is Vice President doesn't seem to have pro-consumer leanings and appears to do a lot of their business with the industries the FCC regulates. I think you'll find that is true of anyone appointed. We don't want another Michael Brown now do we? Sure We do, NOT! |
|
WhatNowPremium
join:2009-05-06
Charlotte, NC | reply to nasadude
Was she not at COVAD when Verizon and other firms sued Covad for filing false trouble tickets and then demanding penalties for missed performance.
»www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c···1053.DTL
It was thought they made money doing this then providing service. |
|
