http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483516 en Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:55:55 EDT Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:55:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22485700 Vegas is relatively small - and has big $$$ business.
L.A. is phyiscally huge - and it would take quite some time to build out.

Many cities in the 100l to 500k wouldn't be too difficult to build quickly. If they hit places with poor cable/DSL deployment (i.e. Charter, Cox, mom/pop cable co or Qwest/CenturyLink) that want expensive service - typically slow rates... The could do well.

Unlike fixed - the most expensive piece is the spectrum licensing itself, and its already been purchased - they just have to use it.
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22485700 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:27:18 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483947 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483947 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:01:18 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483577 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483577 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:07:11 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483516
It would be a decent alternative to forced bundling by cable/telco, or having to pay ~$40/month for 1.5Mbps ADSL dry loop / $46/month cable HSI dry.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Still-not-available-in-SoCal-22483516 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:56:50 EDT