<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;WIMAX!&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/WIMAX-22496100</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:24:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:24:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: WIMAX!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WIMAX-22496478</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : lmao!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WIMAX-22496478</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:41:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WIMAX!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WIMAX-22496246</link>
<description><![CDATA[mod_wastrel posted : I dunno... 802.16 (WiMAX) might fit the bill till 802.22 (WhiteSpace) takes over--presuming it ever gets off the ground. If nothing else, one or both may replace dial-up access entirely (for those still on dial-up, especially if it's "free" :D ...here's hopin'), so it doesn't have to be anywhere near as fast as wired (just orders of magnitude faster than dial-up). Mostly, we just need more options than our local telco and our local cableco--aka the devil you know and the devil you don't know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WIMAX-22496246</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:21:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WIMAX!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/WIMAX-22496100</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : Thats a good one!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/WIMAX-22496100</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:58:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

