 sivranBack to Opera againPremium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
kudos:1
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to fonzbear2000
Re: Good for the ISP's! The ISPs would also be setting a precedent dangerous both for themselves and their customers. If they agreed to filter now, they could easily have put themselves in position to be pushed into even more costly filtering later on.
Any ISP implementing filters would also be at a competitive disadvantage with ISPs who don't. Kinda like the whole cap 'n meter thing. The other ISPs are perfectly content to wait and see whether TWC-RR throws itself off a cliff or cracks open a goldmine. True, AT&T's experimenting with the same, but doing it much more quietly, and only in places where TWC-RR's already doing it.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon profitable cause... |
