http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22500931 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:19:31 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:19:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501951 NetAdmin : nevermind... ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501951 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:45:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501572 Bit : The "28Mb downstream" is probably just uncapped powerboost and 28-33Mb is what you would see from a single otherwise unused DOCSIS channel.
--
POKE 65495,1]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501572 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:46:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501337 iansltx : Unless they did upstream channel bonding, 28 Mbps up would be impossible, though it *would* be really nice. So yeah, 28 Mbps downstream.

While I agree that 25/2 for $79 is weak (I might test it for a month, but wouldn't keep it around) I suppose it's better than Qwest's 896k up DSL which ranges from 1.5 to 20 Mbps depending on your area. Oh, and there's that annoying 15% speed penalty with Qwest, but not with Cox.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501337 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:07:15 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501001 Ikyuao : 28Mbps upstream powerboost???? There is no way this you get 28 upstream powerboost. You'll just only get about 5Mbps to 10Mbps upstream according to Cox communications.
--
Professional Linux environmental blows microsoft windows out of the water.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22501001 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:16:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22500941 Karl Bode : This one goes to eleven.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22500941 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:07:28 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22500931 aaronwt : Why even bother with Powerboost? From 25mbs to 28mbs?

Or is that a 28mbs upstream powerboost?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22500931 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:05:54 EDT