said by PToN :

Is the list on the post made at insecure.org is true, i would wonder if it would be a new vulnerability in *nix..? There is a lot of HP-UX listed there as well as AIX and Sun...

said by KodiacZiller :

Could just be that the T-mobile admins were lazy about security updates. This is how their systems were breached back in 2005. They failed to patch a security exploit that had been widely known about for a while.

said by cyclone_z :

Having worked for one of the companies that sells one of those operating systems, I will tell you that often times big companies are lax on internal security. They have a good firewall, but systems on the other side are unpatched. They make the mistake of trusting the network, but all it takes is one security breach, and then someone is in a wonderland of vulnerable systems. The company I worked for was running a number of unpatched Windows servers, and that got them in trouble when a windows virus got through via email. It then started spreading on the internal network. There were also engineers using Unix workstations running outdated releases of our Unix-based OS for which we were no longer making security patches. They were also using things like rsh, telnet, etc., which don't encrypt anything. Were someone from the outside to get a compromised machine and set ethernet in promiscuous mode -- oh man, a cornucopia of passwords!

T-Mobile may be doing something similar. The lesson is don't trust the network, even if you have a firewall.