 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | reply to kleinml
Re: Comcast Commercials Wow! Okay.. exaggerated?? to say the least, sure!
I mean, Verizon is known for billing issues, but so is Comcast.
Verizon is known for tearing up yards, and not being pretty about it, but so is Comcast.
"Better HD and Faster Internet"... SHAME on Comcast.. "better" is objectionable, and "faster" isn't true..
But still.. the commercial was hilarious. |
|
 GooberPremium join:2000-12-17 Naperville, IL kudos:4 | said by fiberguy:Wow! Okay.. exaggerated?? to say the least, sure! I mean, Verizon is known for billing issues, but so is Comcast. Verizon is known for tearing up yards, and not being pretty about it, but so is Comcast. "Better HD and Faster Internet"... SHAME on Comcast.. "better" is objectionable, and "faster" isn't true.. But still.. the commercial was hilarious. "The fastest internet around" are the exact words, which makes it much more marketing speak than "faster," which is potentially problematic. |
|
 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | But, to say "the fastest" would say that you can't get a faster speed from another provider, right? Because isn't FiOS offering faster speeds? I would think that laying claim to "faster" or "fastest" would be the killer in that commercial.
You know me by now, I'm not one to pick like that, but that one just seems a little odd for me. But, will wait to hear why you say that..  |
|
 GooberPremium join:2000-12-17 Naperville, IL kudos:4 2 edits | It's really just a judgment call. Kind of like saying, "Snapple is made from the best stuff on Earth."
Comcast saying that they're the "Fastest internet around" is so non-specific and is so typical of language used in puffery that I don't think they'd be nailed for making any kind of false representations. It's the "around" word that makes it more advertising than a performance claim. But, I think you would be right if "fastest" was more directly targeted to the FIOS product.
Of course, it doesn't mean that Comcast couldn't be sued and lose. It's like the Papa John's v. Pizza Hut lawsuit. The lower courts initially ruled in Pizza Hut's favor, but then Papa John's won at the appeal level. And, I think that was a closer case than this one.
»advertising.about.com/od/foodrel···ohns.htm
A select quote from the article linked above:
"The better-best argument also affects the results of this case. You've seen commercials where a company claims to have the "best" thingamajig. "Best" can be used without having to backup your statement. When you use "better," you "better" have proof to substantiate your claim." |
|
|
|