<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;256kbps by 2010??&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/256kbps-by-2010-22528170</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:49:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:49:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22530667</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bob61571 posted : 256Kbps by 2010 for the 100 Largest Cities?!<br>Hmmmm?!?<br><br>They really know to set the bar high, don't they?<br>Lowest speed broadband that I see marketed is 768Kbps.<br><br>Maybe, they're in a time warp, and are living in 1999. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22530667</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22529057</link>
<description><![CDATA[IowaMan posted : Ah I misunderstood, I would hope the 256 kps is for areas where it is either Dial-Up or Satellite  As, If I ever had to use less then what I have now (3 Mb Cable) I'd go crazy! but if all you ever had was Dial Up, then it would be an inprovment]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22529057</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:47:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22529032</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1575735" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1575735');">IowaMan</a>:</small><br><br>Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?<br>Someone tell me what they where thinking?<br> </div>If you read a little further, you would have seen they had the same goals for "all other cities" and for all rural areas as well in the same timeframe. It was just that they broke down ALL their recommendations in to those 3 categories.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj1k"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj2k"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj3k"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22529032</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:43:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528589</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bit posted : What do you mean?  Didn't you get the memo, Time Warner says customers want to pay more and get less.  We are just lacking the proper <strike>indoctrination</strike> education.<br><small>--<br>POKE 65495,1</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528589</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:42:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528562</link>
<description><![CDATA[Pashune posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1005135" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1005135');">jimbo2150</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1575735" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1575735');">IowaMan</a>:</small><br><br>Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?<br>Someone tell me what they where thinking?<br> </div>"If we lower peoples' expectations enough, they won't care."<br> </div>That must mean by 2020, we should be back on 56k. <br><small>--<br>ISP: CableOne 3 mbit/300 kbit</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528562</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:38:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528536</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbo2150 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1575735" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1575735');">IowaMan</a>:</small><br><br>Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?<br>Someone tell me what they where thinking?<br> </div>"If we lower peoples' expectations enough, they won't care."<br><small>--<br><br> - "Techie" Jim</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-256kbps-by-2010-22528536</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:34:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>256kbps by 2010??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/256kbps-by-2010-22528170</link>
<description><![CDATA[IowaMan posted : Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?<br>Someone tell me what they where thinking?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/256kbps-by-2010-22528170</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:36:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

