republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to BF69

Re: Why bother?

said by BF69:

No you can't grasp the concept is that if you don't want to pay for it you should not have it.
What people are failing to grasp, here, is that you be required to actually prove specific cases. Even if 99.999% of P2P was piracy, you should still need to prove it to impose sanctions. That is the way our justice system is supposed to work.

If you want civil sanctions, you need to prove to a judge, to some lesser degree than for criminal sanctions. But you must still offer proof.

What the entertainment industry wants is to be able to impose sanctions without even the minimal burden of proof required of civil tort cases. They want to be able to impose sanctions solely on the basis of their assertions. That is flat wrong, no matter how you look at it.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

Saturday, 02-Jun 23:36:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics