| This is good news..... I like the fact that they are not trying to offer IPTV. They're just going to focus on the current product and offer a better version of it. I think that is what a lot of companies (AT&T) should do. Instead of trying to be everything all in one. Just focus on improving what you already sell and make it so that more will want to sign up for it. |
|
 IowaManPremium
join:2008-08-21
Grinnell, IA | Looking at those speeds, Makes me want to FF to the end of the year. as my cable provider is unleashing DOCSIS 3 and I'm surrounded by Qwest but in my particular town is another phone company but alas Mediacom should match Qwest for speeds. |
|
| reply to tdouglas22
I completely agree. It seems useless to waste money on a third or fourth best TV offering. The market is already saturated with satellite and cable. IPTV would not garner many subs, but the cost outlay would be tremendous. |
|
| said by gworkman7:I completely agree. It seems useless to waste money on a third or fourth best TV offering. The market is already saturated with satellite and cable. IPTV would not garner many subs, but the cost outlay would be tremendous. Exactly. Even though a bundle package is a nice cost saver, I'm more concerned with better HSI and telephone service. Stick to what you do best and just focus on making it better. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | reply to gworkman7
said by gworkman7:I completely agree. It seems useless to waste money on a third or fourth best TV offering. The market is already saturated with satellite and cable. IPTV would not garner many subs, but the cost outlay would be tremendous. You can rationalize the IPTV as being free with the VDSL Internet offering. The IPTV costs are a few AAA servers and the programing costs, and loans for the set top boxes. |
|
